1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What a shock: Hollywood pushing back at "The Sniper"

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by hondo, Jan 19, 2015.

  1. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    How about if "confirmed" terrorist is US Citizen? Does he forfeit his 5th amendment rights?
     
  2. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Don't answer Xan. You have the right to remain silent. :D
     
  3. BDC99

    BDC99 Well-Known Member

    If he's in Yemen training with Al-Qaeda? Yep. Tough shit. As long as there's enough evidence, no problem with it whatsoever.
     
  4. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    So you lose your legal rights if outside the USA?
     
  5. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    1944 landing in Anzio. Imagine the damage to the marine echo system.

    [​IMG]
     
  6. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    There's not much more to explain: War is War. My heart bleeds with the best of 'em but I don't get into the whole morality play when it comes to messiness of it all.

    War's a dirty business.
     
  7. BDC99

    BDC99 Well-Known Member

    If there's sufficient evidence that he is a terrorist? Yes. I don't have a problem with that. Better him than me.
     
  8. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    That list isn't accurate until it has this guy on it.

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Well, we always can ask Yemen to arrest him and extradite him back to the U.S. I'm sure Yemen will be very happy to do so.
     
  10. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Pretty harsh critique on Vox. Major spoiler alerts, but this part can be shared:

    "Because Kyle is always right, any limits on his use of violence would, by definition, leave American soldiers in danger. That's something only a naive sheep could want.

    But pretending that heroic sheepdog warriors never accidentally kill civilians is a dangerous lie about the true nature of combat. In the real world, even well-intentioned soldiers do sometimes kill innocent people, because that is how war works.

    Pretending otherwise is an insult to the many American veterans who have to spend the rest of their lives grappling with their actions during the Iraq War, and to the thousands of innocent Iraqis who have been killed since the conflict began. And it's also dangerous, because it tells Americans not to worry about the harm our wars may do to civilians, who are probably all terrorists anyway. It's bad enough to hide that truth behind euphemisms like "collateral damage," but much worse to write it out of the story completely."
     
  11. Mr. Sunshine

    Mr. Sunshine Well-Known Member

    I'm sure most Americans are as stupid as this woman would like us to believe.
     
  12. BDC99

    BDC99 Well-Known Member

    Honestly. What a load of shit that article is. While we might not experience it as directly as many other nations, I would bet most Americans realize that there is "collateral damage" in war. Always has been, but hopefully technology is making it easier to avoid. Who the fuck is pretending that civilians are never killed in war zones?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page