Supreme Court rules in favor of gay marriage

I most definitely did. She thinks the movement is being dominated by a "white men's club" (talk about evil!!!) that is ignoring a lot of other issues more important than marriage.

And she also noted that the current generation is "less monogamous" than any other before. But less monogamous and marriage go together in today's Bizarro World.

 

Oh, so now you read it, and clearly she isn't against gay marriage. She is only against that issue taking such precedence over others. Busted again, tony. You really are having a rough time.

 

Tony might accidentally end up gay by reading all of this.

 

So you admit that it's not genetic?

 

Yeah, that line of argument is resting on some pretty dicey ground. Glad it's not mine.

BTW, my argument is that the state should get out of the business of privileging (is that a word? let me run that by 93devil) certain relationships while not privileging others. That makes all this stuff moot.

 

This is a tremendous performance you're putting on.

 

Me? Well thank you, I'll be here all week. Try the veal ...

 

Ha!

No, sadly, tony. You're just ultra-rational dq.

 

He's had lots of practice.

 

And now the Texas Attorney says "Hey, we're Texas. We'll do what we want."

Texas AG: County clerks can refuse gay couples | www.statesman.com

Amazing that this man is so hell bent on defending the Constitution but has no problem completely ignoring the entirety of Article Three which clearly spells out how the government will be organized and what rule the Supreme Court's decisions have in the land.

 

I'll take empty grandstanding for $1000, Alex ...

 

There's a 'Steers and queers' headline in there somewhere, but I've been at work too long to figure it out.