Mass shooting on campus in Oregon

I'm just pissed that Republicans had finally found a bi-racial guy who identified as one of us, and he turned out to be a killer.

 

I might suggest not taking your news from wingnut sites.

But I suspect you knew that. Usually you provide a link when you post news here. This time you didn't. Seemed suspicious.

 

Buried gold ...

Prescott Bush won a Senate seat two years later, and his son George and daughter-in-law Barbara continued to support Planned Parenthood even after George’s election to Congress from Texas. In fact, he was such an advocate for family planning that some House colleagues gave him the nickname “Rubbers.”

 

I protest the characterization of our conservative friends as wingnuts.

Wingnuts are easy to remove and change.

 

Nice work, Geraldo.

 

Does this seem unreasonable or un-Constitutional?

 

Yep, this is usually the revelation that usually ends YF's rants about Planned Parenthood being a racist organization.

 

Unlike driving, the right to bear arms is a conditional right.

Substitute abortion or the right to free speech in place of guns and let us know if you think it's unreasonable or in-Constitutional.

 

Hardly. What year was Prescott Bush born?

Do you think his views on race would be considered mainstream today?

 

What year was "Rubbers" born? Was he racist? Did he raise his kids as racists, too? What year is it now?

 

I never had a car inspection in 26 years in Florida, and beyond an eye test taken 30 years ago, no one has ever inspected my health to see if I am fit to drive. As for driver training, if you can pass the practical test without any training, no one will know the difference.

 

Substituting abortion or free speech wouldn't make any sense because neither involve ownership of an object. Of course, you knew that.

And, as has already been established, the right to keep and bear arms is conditional. So, unless you're arguing that any and all regulation of gun ownership is a violation of the Second Amendment, I'd be curious to hear your specific objections to the conditions in that graphic, particularly as they relate to Constitutionality.