1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Draft Kings

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by poindexter, Aug 13, 2015.

  1. JackReacher

    JackReacher Well-Known Member

    It usually takes me about the same amount of time to fill out my shitty DraftKings lineup as it does to pick my shitty lotto numbers. :)
     
  2. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Unless there's a "quick play" where they pick the lineup for you, it's still different.

    Plus, a lot of the folks blowing money on lotto don't have a computer, internet, or a credit card. They're unlikely customers for DraftKings, but they're the lottery's bread and butter.
     
  3. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Ragu is trying to Zing! me, but instead he has completely misrepresented by objection to the state-run lottery.

    There is a good reason I haven't started any threads on slot machines.
     
  4. JackReacher

    JackReacher Well-Known Member

    I get it. It was a joke. I honestly don't give a shit one way or another. I will say that I have won more on DraftKings in the past year than I have playing the lottery. For now anyway. Until I give it all back.
     
  5. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    I know, but still felt like it was worth pointing out.

    I'm sure that once you set up the account, and have all of your credit card info on file, they make it very easy for you to spend your money.
     
  6. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    As I said, it's futile.

    The thread itself is still there. You did your usual passive-aggressive style of posting in which you thought you were making a point by trying to be facetious. That is what you just quoted.

    You also said this:

    You equated people making a choice to play the lottery. ... with paycheck advance stores and then heroin (i.e. -- it's bad for you. Let me think of somehing I think is REALLY bad for you to equate it to!). Sure you said that it was the state selling the lottery. But that was NOT the main thrust of your objections during the exchange I just pointed to. You dismissed my posts about people being able to make the choice for themselves about whether to spend their money on a lottery. Again, anyone can click on the thread and see for themselves.

    In your responses to me, you weren't saying that the problem was that the states had coopted the market for the lottery. You were saying that poor people were being exploited. In multiple posts. When I suggested that they were free to make a choice to play the lottery or not based on whatever THEY felt gave them the most utility for their money, you were downright dismissive. I got this gem (typical posting style again) from you:

    As I said, the thread is still there. Anyone can look. Sure, it was about the fact that states provide the lottery-- because that is who DOES run the lottery -- but your posts about peoples' choices about how to spend their money were very different on that one. You were all paternalistic there.
     
  7. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    It's a hell of a lot of fun, but I basically need to spend the offseason learning the leagues inside and out.

    You think you know baseball. And then you try to pick a Fan Duel lineup on the fly.
     
  8. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    You absolutely, positively, unequivocally could not be more wrong. Not even if you wrote a book called, "Jack Morris: The Case for Cooperstown."

    Yes, lotteries are a problem because they exploit poor people. And so are slot machines. And so are cigarettes.

    The government isn't operating slot machines, though. And the government isn't selling cigarettes.

    Hence my objection to lotteries, and not to slot machines and cigarettes.
     
  9. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    It's a bit odd to me, then that you would argue with me -- and dismiss my posts -- when you agreed with everything I was saying!

    I mean, I said my opinion was that states shouldn't be running lotteries. No argument from you. In the same post I said that regardless of WHO runs the lottery, people should be free to make decisions about how to spend their money themselves. Post after post from you arguing with that notion -- about people being exploited. About spending their money irresponsibly. The attempt at sarcasm at people knowing what makes them happy.

    I guess I misunderstood your posts, though. You were responding to me dismissively and with attempted sarcasm because you AGREED with what I said.
     
  10. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    I'd go further than you, and include cigarettes, because of the high taxes.

    We know cigarettes are deadly, and addictive, and the government has essentially made themselves partners with the cigarette companies. They're hooked on the revenue.
     
  11. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Ahem ... while this is technically true, the government's not selling cigarettes doesn't remove its guilt for being a senior partner in their manufacture/sale.
     
  12. trifectarich

    trifectarich Well-Known Member

    True. But governments rely on both to make boatloads of money, and the elected officials who spend this cash will do almost anything to see that there's more of it coming in next week, next month, next year . . .
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page