1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

San Bernardino

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Inky_Wretch, Dec 2, 2015.

  1. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    So did the Confederates in the 1860s.
     
  2. Stoney

    Stoney Well-Known Member

    Exactly. The founding fathers never intended for the Constitution to be to be treated as eternal holy writ like so many today seem to think. That's why they put in that whole amendment process so we could change it as need be to adapt with the times. But nowadays if anyone even suggests we avail ourselves of that process people act like it's a suggestion of mortal sin.

    I suspect those guys would be shitting their pants in disgust if they knew how their Second Amendment was now being used by to justify loonies massacring innocents with ARs (weaponry not even conceivable back then). Jefferson's response to "but it's in the Constitution" would be "then change it, you dumbasses...."
     
    Riptide and schiezainc like this.
  3. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    So amend it.
     
  4. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    lol
     
  5. JayFarrar

    JayFarrar Well-Known Member

    The Constitution is much like the Bible, there's parts that are really good and parts that should be ignored.
     
  6. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    Watching the media and the administration has been amazing today.
    The left is doing literally everything it can to shift this into a gun debate instead of an Islamic terrorism debate.
     
  7. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    It also wasn't meant to be permanent even with amendments. The assumption was that you would have regular constitutional conventions as your nation grew and changed. The amendment mechanism is actually a great example of a part that was designed for the time period and does not scale well to modern times.
     
  8. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    False choice fallacy.
     
  9. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    Explain it then, sir.
    The last thing SJ.com needs is another logician, by the way.
     
  10. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

  11. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    A 22-year-old health inspector living with his parents? What a catch!
     
  12. Stoney

    Stoney Well-Known Member

    True, and the right is doing the opposite contortions. And with neither side seeming to much realize the answer can be both.

    Two genuine problems conflated to create this massacre, but instead of seriously addressing it as such, too many will only acknowledge that which suits their political "side."
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2015
    TyWebb and Neutral Corner like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page