1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

RIP Antonin Scalia

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Steak Snabler, Feb 13, 2016.

  1. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    He punted before he even got out of the locker room on single-payer health care. He gave away the store on the sequesterization deal.
     
    Smallpotatoes likes this.
  2. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    Sorry. Didn't realize Madison, Jefferson and crew were part of those amendments as well. My bad. Carry on.
     
  3. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    There is plenty to criticize in a rational discussion of the Obama presidency. Unfortunately, we never get to that discussion because most of the Conservatives on this board are too busy demonizing all Democrats and blaming them for all of the world's evils.
     
  4. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    We need to Take America Back ... to 2008!
     
  5. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    It's ok. The Amendments corrected the founders deficiencies. Scalia gave the text a biblical reverence, when it suited his purposes. But he was a poor Talmudic scholar. He thought it was funny that the violence against women act was found unconstitutional yet found federal anti- marijuana laws constitutional, even though the underpinnings of both were essentially identical. He got his person policies passed. Bush v Gore was horrific and maybe the demarcation point between the past glory of America and the future of America as a small minded country of inbred crackers.
     
  6. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    I guess my point is that if you are an originalist and fundamental changes you (presumably) agree with can be made in the 1860s why not 2016?
     
  7. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    Because you must change the text by Constitutional process, not interpretation. Which makes abortion, which was not illegal in 1789, a difficult question for the right wing demigods
     
  8. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

  9. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    It doesn't matter if abortion was illegal in 1789. What matters is if it was considered a Constitutional right in 1789. What matters is if a state could have made it illegal, not whether they did do so or not.
     
    YankeeFan and BTExpress like this.
  10. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

  11. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

  12. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Every time I hear that name, "Coal Miner's Daughter" starts playing in my head.
     
    Baron Scicluna, HanSenSE and Riptide like this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page