1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

RIP Antonin Scalia

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Steak Snabler, Feb 13, 2016.

  1. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    Elections have consequences.
     
  2. exmediahack

    exmediahack Well-Known Member

    They do.

    It's why Obama can name whomever he wants because he won 2008 and 2012.

    Also why the Republicans have every right to block it. They won majority in 2014.

    Romney could have run a better campaign in 2012 and Obama could have governed a little more to the right before 2010 and 2014 and helped keep the Democrats in power in the Senate.
     
  3. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    For sure.

    Personally, I think Obama should nominate someone, and they should get a hearing and a vote.

    And, I believe that most nominees should be approved. Their fitness for office should be what matters, not their political views.

    But, I'm also not going to cry for the President. He voted against Roberts and Alito, who were both fit for the job. He voted against them for political/ideological reasons. Payback is a bitch too.

    I don't know how we ever reset things to where everything isn't so political.

    So, I do expect the Republicans will block any nominee. And, the public can hold them responsible if they see fit.

    If Clinton (or Sanders) wins, it will be for nothing. But, if they allow a nominee to go through, their base would completely abandon them, and would likely exert a higher price. Plus, they'll hand the nomination to Trump if they ok a nominee.

    I think it also shows how weak their majority is. If they thought it would hold, they'd just give a nominee a vote, and vote him down. (Bork got voted down, and we ended up with Kennedy.) But, they don't trust it going to a vote.
     
    Batman likes this.
  4. BDC99

    BDC99 Well-Known Member

    Exactly. Let the Republicans block as many as they want. And let the voters punish or reward them as they see fit. This really doesn't need to be that complicated.
     
  5. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    I don't disagree with any of that, but I do think the GOP will get pummeled by a wider margin in the general election if they decide to pick this fight.
     
  6. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    It's certainly possible. Time will tell.
     
  7. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    Obama couldn't possibly go 3 for 3 in naming females to the SCt
     
  8. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Trump's Twitter feed is on it.



    –Ted Cruz is the solicitor general of Texas
     
  9. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Obama should nominate Loretta Lynch and dare them to vote down a black woman in this election cycle. She was vetted and confirmed less than a year ago.
     
  10. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    I'm sure they'd be terrified of pissing off their base of black females.
     
    BTExpress and YankeeFan like this.
  11. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    Mitch McConnell Inflates Throat Pouch In
    Show Of Dominance Over Fellow Congressional Males

    [​IMG]
     
    Neutral Corner likes this.
  12. schiezainc

    schiezainc Well-Known Member

    One thing I had never considered prior to this.
    If the Senate does follow through with plans not to even consider Obama's nominee until 2017, we are officially establishing precedent going forward that no president will be able to appoint an SC nominee in his/her final year. That's cutting out at least 25% of any given term.
    I wonder if that's really the route people want to go given that the last five sitting presidents have all made at least two appointments during their time in office.
     
    HanSenSE likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page