1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

RIP Antonin Scalia

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Steak Snabler, Feb 13, 2016.

  1. Big Circus

    Big Circus Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]
     
  2. swingline

    swingline Well-Known Member

    Every time someone posts that "MORANS" picture, I wonder if that guy knows he's a laughingstock. Hell, my first-grader spells better than that.
     
  3. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    This can't be real:

    Get A Brain, Morans!
     
  4. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    It does, and, given who the GOP now represents, it probably should.

    It's America. It's capitalism. Not everybody wins. The better some poor folks do, the worse the most rich do.
     
  5. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Horse poop. It was Reagan, who nominated Bork, a hatchet man for Nixon.

    Anthony Kennedy was 97-0.
     
  6. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    IIRC this case was specifically drawn up in the Koch laboratories with the expectation of losing repeatedly and quickly until it could get to the SCOTUS where Scalia would create new, anti-union, law.

    Oops.
     
    cranberry likes this.
  7. Guy_Incognito

    Guy_Incognito Well-Known Member

    Of course you think this.
     
  8. Guy_Incognito

    Guy_Incognito Well-Known Member

    There's a pony in there somewhere...

    Oh, give me a break. Bork was as qualified as any other nominee. They hated his ideology and voted him down for it and nothing has been the same since.
     
    old_tony likes this.
  9. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    Bork pretty much disqualified himself when he carried out the Massacre in exchange for the promise that Nixon would put him on the court. As if his two superiors resigning rather than carry out the request wasn't a big enough clue.
     
    cranberry likes this.
  10. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    The Dems are given a fairly decent chance of flipping the Senate back in any event, and if the pig Trump at the top of the ticket goes down to a 60-40 ass blasting, could grab a healthy margin of control. And if that happens, get ready for Michael Moore and Noam Chomsky on the SC.

    The doddering old Dems (Ginsburg and Breyer) on the court would check out within six months (hell, probably six days) and be replaced by fresh young 45-year-old liberal faces. Then it just becomes a race against time whether Kennedy (79) or Clarence (67) can hang on until another GOP president arrives. If they can't, the teabag obstructionists will wish to god they had settled for Garland. They could be looking down the wrong end of a 7-2 barrel.
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2016
  11. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Careful with your history there ...
     
  12. RevPastor

    RevPastor Member

    This isn't true. "Rich folks" will ultimately start losing as the divide increases. Their only hope is that the "poor folks" start doing better.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page