Explain this to me like I'm a second-grader

No, I don't "understand" anything about that pile of specious allegations created to raise doubt about HRC among stupid people.

 

Whitewater and the cattle future trades were in 1978/1979.

The Clinton Foundation was founded after Bill left office in 2001.

They've been involved in unethical/criminal behavior for nearly 40 years.

It's not due to conspiracy nor coincidence that they've been subject to investigations for decades.

 

OK, you're a voter.

How does any of this, at all, directly affect your life in any way?

 

But if something has been investigated five times (Vince Foster's death) or eight times (the Benghazi attacks) and the investigations don't find what you want them to find, why keep investigating?

 

Yes, I know that's the party line that you're forced to repeat because you've admitted you have no qualms about lying in order to advance your political interests.

 

Whitewater happened in the late 70s. The Republican investigation didn't begin until the 1990s, once he became president.

If it was such a big problem, why didn't Republicans in Arkansas investigate it, in, oh, around 1980 or so?

 

Smart people haven't had any doubts about Herself for a long, long time ...

 

Fixed.

 

Context remains exactly the same with cran's changes.

 

There's a huge difference between "haven't had for a very long time" and "never had."

 

Who does the left blame if Hillary loses?

 

Bernie, duh.