1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Serial

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by JackReacher, Nov 20, 2014.

  1. Webster

    Webster Well-Known Member

    Been underwhelmed with the updates so far. They have been too confusing and a little gossipy.
     
  2. sgreenwell

    sgreenwell Well-Known Member

    Way, way, wayyyyy too breathlessly excited on them, plus, it sounds like an amateur operation because they don't edit out the "geez I hope this phone call works!" stuff.
     
  3. Guy_Incognito

    Guy_Incognito Well-Known Member

    I agree that this year has been a step backward, especially with the timing being off. That said, I thought this last episode was the strongest one I've heard in a while. Maybe I just like politics better than military, but I enjoyed it and am looking forward to the next one.
    Also, does anyone else feel like her update of last years case just stopped without warning or closure?
    Either way, I'm enjoying catching up on the radio lab archives. What a fantastic show.
     
  4. Moderator1

    Moderator1 Moderator Staff Member

    Has there been resolution to the season 1 hearings? Was he granted a new trial?
     
  5. Webster

    Webster Well-Known Member

    Season 2 ended rather abruptly. I liked the part of the last episode dealing with whether the search Bergdahl leading to any US soldier deaths. Tying it into whatever overarching point they were trying to make seemed a little forced. I guess there was never going to be a neat resolution to the season but the fact that she didn't have direct access to him really hurt the season.
     
  6. TyWebb

    TyWebb Well-Known Member

    The more I listened to it (haven't listened to the last episode yet), the more I thought that they just picked the wrong story/case for this format. With no direct access to Bergdahl, it was going to be tough to have any meaningful discoveries. The whole thing has felt like a rehashing of a story we've already heard. I have mostly listened to it as background noise when I'm doing something else, as opposed to the first season when I was hooked on every word.
     
    sgreenwell likes this.
  7. sgreenwell

    sgreenwell Well-Known Member

    Definitely agree. I think the "who done it?" or mystery format works better for what they're doing. This whole season, it felt like they were biting off more than they could chew.
     
  8. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

  9. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    Glad he's getting a new trial. He deserved one.

    Also, he did it.
     
    sgreenwell and LongTimeListener like this.
  10. Moderator1

    Moderator1 Moderator Staff Member

    You base that on what? I listened to the podcast and thought he may well have but I heard nothing that made it as clear as it should be for a conviction. And I'm not saying that in a NO YOU ARE WRONG manner. Just curious what makes it clear to you
     
    Amy likes this.
  11. JRoyal

    JRoyal Well-Known Member

    I couldn't say definitively either way if he did it or not. It's pretty clear from everything that's come out on this and other podcasts and blogs, though, that the evidence wasn't there to convict him. There's definitely reasonable doubt.
     
  12. Amy

    Amy Well-Known Member

    I lean towards he did it than he didn't and I wanted to believe he didn't do it.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page