Explain this to me like I'm a second-grader

I love that OT is just gliding by on the assumption that Donald Trump (DONALD TRUMP!) is as pure as the driven snow.

 

Accuracy In Politics: Snopes Got Snoped

 

Conservatives also have a short memory for all of the embassy attacks far, far more deadly than Benghazi that took place during GOP administrations. The media has made very little effort to put Benghazi in perspective.

 

No one, particularly me, has said anything even close to Trump being pure or unflawed. He's very flawed. And still miles better than the most corrupt woman of modern history.

 

The perspective is that a liberal - a woman, even (gasp!) a CLINTON! - can be made to look bad. That's all that's necessary. The rest is old shit.

 

Not so fast.

https://www.truthorfiction.com/snopes/

 

But he'll pick people who can cover his weaknesses. No possibility of corruption there.

 

I'm not a Clinton fan. But the media have certainly helped give us two of the most disgusting candidates ever.

 

I'm sure any minute now you'll post all the links to the lies put forth by those GOP administrations in the immediate aftermath of those attacks. And, for sure, all the stories about how organized radical Islamic Jihad was such a huge part of the world scene in the 1980s.

 

The USFL

 

Snopes, “Liberal Bias,” and Trusting the Internet

 

Lot less possibility than with Hillary.