Explain this to me like I'm a second-grader

Lulz. You're truly delusional.

 

I trust that you would enthusiastically vote for the replacement nominee.

 

Isn't that an option?

After the FBI's findings, why isn't this an option for all the Dems who "aren't big fans" of hers?

Is there a single Dem who's suggested it, or are they all circling the wagons?

 

Wait, weren't you deeply concerned with the will of the people after Brexit?

This kind of stuff is precisely why you can't be taken seriously.

 

It is FAR more likely that Trump isn't the nominee. But hold your breath and it could happen!

 

And of course, since the Republicans don't like the outcome ... it's time to hold ... wait for it ... more hearings!

This time, they want Lynch and Comey to testify.

House Republicans promise Clinton email probe is not over

 

Fucking unreal.

 

As likely as all the Dems who are disappointed in Trump as the GOP nominee would be to vote for Kasich or some better GOP candidate.

 

The nominating process is a party fiction, and they've designed it specifically so that the party leadership has enormous powers to choose the nominee, up until the very last moment.

Why no nominate a flawed candidate, who can't be trusted to properly handle sensitive material, and who we know will do everything in her power to thwart oversight?

Republicans are stuck with Trump. Dems could choose to nominate someone else.

So, which party is more fucked up?

 

The party that nominated a Nazi-sympathetic fascist who advocates torture and murder of civilians.

 

Oops ...

WASHINGTON — The State Department has discovered a dozen emails containing classified information that were sent to the personal email accounts of Colin L. Powell and close aides of Condoleezza Rice during their tenures as secretaries of state for President George W. Bush.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/05/u...zza-rice-colin-powell.html?smid=fb-share&_r=0

 

I'm pretty close to completely tuning out politics completely at this point.