1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Before that one ...



    After it ...



    Still a bad look.

    Imagine him tweeting something similar about the strategic brilliance of Osama's 9/11 attack.
     
    SnarkShark, HanSenSE and heyabbott like this.
  2. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    If you want to talk about the historical context of Pearl Harbor and Japans actions, reasons and abilities, do it the other 363 days of the year.

    9/11 is also the wrong day to discuss the ease in which 11 guys can kill 3000 Were the professionally proficient terrorists Newty
     
  3. Vombatus

    Vombatus Well-Known Member

    Agreed, a bit of a radioactive topic, but I think he was making a point that we can't aftord to be surprised again (which would be a third time. Some at my shop refers to 9/11 as Pearl Harbor #2.)
     
  4. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    It's a post-factual world now. Context doesn't matter. Nobody has an attention span longer than one tweet.
     
  5. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    I would like to suggest that citing tweets is a hopeless and useless means of advancing any political debate/discussion. Even Trump's. Especially Trump's.
     
    HanSenSE likes this.
  6. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Fake news stories were so unfair to democrats in 2016:

     
  7. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Hey, we never said we vouched for the source -- that demands public anonymity -- that we built our story around.



     
    Vombatus likes this.
  8. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    They're great stenographers for the State Department, however.
     
  9. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Same take -- talking points, plagiarism, or just "great minds" thinking alike? -- but a little higher up the food chain.

    These folks really are unhinged.

     
  10. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Wow. This is sort of a bold statement:



    Oh. It turns out, it's "fake news":

     
  11. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    The key question, though: How many Republicans will want him at their functions? A few, I imagine, but not a lot.
     
  12. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    Posting this to get YF back on track ...

    [​IMG]
     
    HanSenSE likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page