1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Actually, I'd be equally disturbed if Russia played a role in getting Clinton elected (since I didn't vote for her). Or if Putin helped McMullin get into office. Or if Russia helped Obama win the office.

    Of course, if any of those things were being alleged then the GOP would have already convened a special investigation that would have made BENGHAZI look like a quilting bee.
     
  2. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    It can't be said enough about Trump's state of mind: Ruskies messing with election and I win, good. Ruskies messing with election and I lose. Bad. It's about the process, not Donald.
     
  3. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    They're, at worst, hacking emails and exposing our own dirty laundry. It's not false laundry. It's not misleading laundry. It's our own laundry that someone else should have leaked. Would it have been so awful had the Washington Post done it? We'd be celebrating it. "Journalists fucking with an election, hooray!" What's scary is that perhaps they DID have the information and just, uh, kept a lid on it (because it would have helped the other guy).

    The more information a voter has . . . the better, right? The hacked emails provided more information . . . right?
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2016
  4. DanielSimpsonDay

    DanielSimpsonDay Well-Known Member

     
    dixiehack likes this.
  5. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    No, they manipulated our election process for their political gains, with the added attraction of putting a complete bozo in the Oval Office. That should alarm all of us.
     
  6. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    There have been credible accusations that some of the leaked documents have been edited
     
  7. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    I saw it, many years ago. Mostly it didn't stick. If that was a movie reference it sailed far over my head for a two base error.
     
    doctorquant likes this.
  8. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    I brought that up during the election season and I got the sort of response I'd expect if I had said the moon landing was faked. It didn't matter what links or quotes I provided, I was shouted down.
     
  9. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    How do you know this? You sound like Reince Priebus denying that the RNC was hacked. Sometimes hackers are detected, and sometimes they are not.
     
  10. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    How was the "process" manipulated?

    If no machines were tampered with, and no voters were prevented from voting, then the "process" of voting wasn't affected.

    They, at worst, released information beforehand that the public could choose to believe or not believe --- just as our government makes all kinds of statements about other nations and their leaders that you can either believe (as almost all of you do) or not believe (as I tend to do).
     
    cjericho likes this.
  11. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    Nothing is real
    Everything is a lie
    There is no truth
    There is only one reality
    The God Emperor
     
  12. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Lost in all of the politicization of this is that Julian Assange keeps insisting that he did not obtain the stuff that Wikileaks made public from the Russians. I have no idea if he is telling the truth. But I don't discount the likelihood that there is a sordid story without clear lines behind the leaked e-mails.

    Also, the Podesta e-mail account was a gmail account. And whoever gained access, probably did it with a phishing e-mail (that looked like it came from Gmail) that he fell for, clicking on their link. If you are in politics, with all of the dirtiness and BS you engage in, and you are leaving all of your sensitive correspondence on a google server in a gmail account, a part of me says you deserve it when the stuff gets exposed that way. It's even worse if you handed whoever got access the keys to your account because you were so unsophisticated that you didn't recognize a phishing e-mail.

    Before the election there were all kinds of entities waging propaganda campaigns using all kinds of methods. Industry groups, labor unions, religious groups, all kinds of PACs, etc. representing all kinds of interests. That is what happens in a society that allows the free flow of information. It's incumbent upon people to filter things for themselves and make what they want of the things they see. That is the way it has always been -- in a free society. Let's say that Russia made a concerted effort to influence opinion here. Let's say it was an actual propaganda campaign that goes beyond the leaked e-mails. For me, it would be no better or worse than the thousands of other entities with an interest trying to change people's opinions -- many that I personally think have crummy motives and are dishonest in what they do to try to influence people. It is absolute hysteria to do "the Russians!" thing. It's also disingenuous. This is what many countries do. They wage propaganda wars to try to advance their interests. The U.S. has been meddling with other countries' politics and elections for more than a century, and we have done way worse things than releasing someone's real e-mails (if this was state sponsored): we have outright sponsored coups when democratically-elected leaders we didn't want won, and we have assassinated politicians we found unfriendly.

    If there is / was any evidence that Russia tampered with the actual voting in our election, it would be one thing. Then I could understand this level of outrage. But that isn't the case as far as any of us know, and all we are getting is something that serves no purpose except to try to delegitimize Trump under the guise of something else.

    For his part, I think Trump is handling it in a bungling way. At the same time, what is he supposed to do, delegitimize his win? And for what purpose? Unless the actual vote was tampered with, he won the election. Some people who are grasping at this need to wrap their heads around it.
     
    FileNotFound likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page