1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Speak Arabic, get booted off a plane.



    (Also, too, this guy has more than 1m subscribers on YouTube and he's flying coach?)
     
  2. LanceyHoward

    LanceyHoward Well-Known Member

    I was typing another post and did not see your reply. Of course it is not free. I have sons aged 21 and 24 who are in fine health. And I have a 23 year old nephew with a rare kidney disease who is looking at a 25% chance of needing a transplant someday. So I may wind up subsidizing him. Is it really that much of a burden to subsidize the most infirm, especially when one never knows if they might someday land in that situation?

    And while our system is fucked up not many in the world have completely solved the problem.
     
  3. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    No, but subsidizing them via health insurance that isn't really insurance is very, very stupid.
     
    YankeeFan likes this.
  4. LanceyHoward

    LanceyHoward Well-Known Member

    I don't have time to look it up but off the top of my head the governemnt pays through various programs over half of medical costs. THe number of Americans is ocial over half
    And the correct answer is?
     
  5. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    I don't know what the "correct" answer is. Perhaps there's not a correct answer. But even if that's the case, some answers are more incorrect than others. And pretending to "insure" those with pre-existing conditions is clearly on the "more incorrect" side of the spectrum.
     
  6. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Oh. It was a joke.

    Lena Dunham has apologized for saying she wished she had an abortion.

    “My latest podcast episode was meant to tell a multifaceted story about reproductive choice in America, to explain the many reasons women do or don’t choose to have children and what bodily autonomy really means,” she wrote on Instagram Tuesday. “I’m so proud of the medley of voices in the episode. I truly hope a distasteful joke on my part won’t diminish the amazing work of all the women who participated.”


    http://pagesix.com/2016/12/21/lena-dunham-apologizes-for-distasteful-joke-about-abortion/
     
  7. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    But the counterargument to Obamacare is we shouldn't be subsidizing anyone. Period.

    Lancey, the answer is 134 million. That includes Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP and TRICARE.
     
  8. Hermes

    Hermes Well-Known Member

    I think your intertuitions are big-time correct. People are saying that. Most people are saying that. They're good people. The best people.

    Oh, God, I've typed too much. Where's the takeback button on this thing, Pence?
     
  9. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    So ... back to the ditches?
     
  10. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    "A" counterargument ... not "the"

    LOL ... keep it up, pal, and I'll throw your sorry ass in myself!
     
    Ace likes this.
  11. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    More like quintupled down on it.

    But, to my knowledge, there is not one proposal out there, formal or informal, that decouples health care from insurance besides ... single-payer.
     
  12. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Despite no evidence...

     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page