1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    Right. Commuter satisfaction has dropped something like 20 percentage points in the last three years alone.

    Not to mention the growing populations of places like Woodbridge, which is 15 miles of I-95 hell south of the last Metro stops.
     
  2. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    I appear to have started a lengthy discussion because of an omission in a short post. Yes people can (although most do not) live without a car. But if you have a car, it has to be insured. Nobody lives without needing medical care, so requiring insurance is not onerous. It'd be better if care and payment were just guaranteed by a single system, but our system has too many built in pressure points of influential (wealthy) participants for that to happen.
     
  3. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    Yeah, what could possibly happen? Probably not ... just like Americans in foreign countries won't need the help of any of the ambassadors that aren't there because Trump fired them all.
     
  4. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    A good friend lives in Bethesda. Instead of taking transit (a bus, I believe) for the 12 or 13 mile trip to the Hill, he drives. When he has used transit, it took him an hour. Driving that far "only" takes an hour during peak commuting times.

    He's very jealous of my four minute (depending on the traffic light) commute.
     
  5. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    OK. But overall that 9 percent number tracks fairly closely with the number of people who didn't have health insurance.

    I guess to continue the analogy, we would make these people either buy cars or pay a fee to reduce the overall risk of those participating in the car insurance pool.
     
  6. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Why don't we just all agree that the "car insurance is required!" argument is a really shitty one?
     
  7. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    Yes, that's correct. I was just arguing that "people don't need cars" isn't always that simple, as NC pointed out earlier.

    What that also doesn't show is that I'm pretty sure employers in DC proper are required by law to offer public transportation subsidies to employees.

    People in DC also use Zipcar a lot, which has insurance built into its charges already like any other rental agency. You need to have a driver's license, obviously, but you only pay insurance when you're actually using a Zipcar.

    Unfortunately for the analogy, fee-for-service is one of the biggest drivers of exorbitant costs in health care.
     
  8. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Having grown up in Lorton, I'm convinced there's no worse stretch of road in American than I-95 between the Occoquan River bridge and Fredericksburg. That's a rant for another thread, though ...
     
  9. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

  10. cjericho

    cjericho Well-Known Member

    So wouldn't electricity and phone service be better if it was guaranteed by one system?
     
  11. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Who needs vetting!?!

     
  12. Vombatus

    Vombatus Well-Known Member

    I wouldn't do that if I were you. He could become an axe murderer, child molester, etc. Don't associate yourself with this suspicious looking Nathan character.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page