President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

What does the piece say exactly?

 

When it originally went up, or now?

They've been making changes to it throughout the day including the headline:

 

What were the alternate facts that Spicer was pointing out?

And when Hillary said that Benghazi was motivated by a video, was that an intentional fabrication? Or did she just say something that she believed was accurate at the time she said it and ended up just being proven wrong later?

 

Umm, the most popular Republican since Reagan?

 

Wonder if Moira is a fan of "The Professor Is In?"

 

Who called it the "best class of Republican candidates?" You? Bullshit. Your entire premise is absolute crap.

 

Take a look at this @Alma:

 

That line in bold is a blatant lie. You don't do this. You constantly play the role of Trump apologist. The rest of this post of yours proves what I and others have been saying about you deflecting by constantly attacking others when somebody dares to criticize President Trump.

You claimed you are willing to criticize him, then spent half of a long, rambling post attacking others for criticizing him and the other half praising Trump.

It really is no wonder. You are just following Trump's example of constantly lying and then deflecting or changing the subject whenever you get caught.

 

Dude, many Republican's along with political pundits considered it a very strong field, as reflected in this article:

The Republican primary battle has been called a wide-open contest — the “deepest” and “strongest” field in many cycles. It is full of the party’s rising stars and hopefuls, like Scott Walker, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Chris Christie, Ben Carson, Ted Cruz and Bobby Jindal, alongside the most formidable name in Republican politics: Bush.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/10/...idential-field-looks-chaotic-its-nothtml.html

Or this one:

Operatives who have run past long-shot campaigns, however, are skeptical that these three will become substantial players in the GOP contest.

“It’s delusionary,” said Ed Rollins, who worked on long-shot campaigns for Mr. Huckabee in 2008 and Rep. Michele Bachmann (R., Minn.) in 2012. “It’s a very strong field this time. Some of these people could have given Romney a run for his money had they run four years ago. There’s no real shot for them now.”

Three New GOP Candidates to Enter 2016 Race

 

The party of science!

 

At all. I haven't paid attention today