A Universal Theory of SJ.com

What if they agree but are just doing some light necking?

 

As did Dirty Signs with Kristin...

 

I'd say less than 1 percent of online discussion is actually constructive, which is pretty ironic for something once billed as "The Information Super Highway."

 

Physical highways were started with good intentions too though, and all it took was a couple fuck-ups on the road to make your morning and afternoon commutes monstrous.

 

People model negative behavior of others? Say it isn't so!

 

I thought what unified us was that 98% of us have a sense of humor and can occasionally have (or tolerate) slightly perverted thoughts.

 

Does trolling trolls count as trolling or an act of service on par with, say, donating blood or saving someone from drowning?

 

I also think there is a lot of content posted that is not intended as trolling but is perceived as trolling.

 

Being a raging dickhead and rubbing your success in people's faces isn't trolling. It's just being a raging dickhead.

 

So, different than blood donation?

 

Sucked. Couldn't get my tie length right.

 

I deleted the line. It's clear from last time that he doesn't understand that I wasn't making fun of his writing prowess, but rather his insecurity about his writing prowess.