1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Membership Housing

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by Songbird, Mar 27, 2017.

  1. qtlaw

    qtlaw Well-Known Member

    Having been involved with several timeshares, the key component is that once the upfront payments are made, the developers have basically recouped their investment and almost everything after is gravy. So the developer here gets to sit on $4M until you leave AND is the legal owner of the property so if it appreciates, they get that as well. Good business model if you can get it.
     
  2. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    Pretty pessimistic attitude if you haven't seen what the Activities Director has in store yet.
     
    dixiehack and SpeedTchr like this.
  3. KJIM

    KJIM Well-Known Member

    What? I thought reverse mortgages were for those folks. Why would someone fork over $150k of their retirement for a place they're going to live in until they die? At that age, I want all my money in play, not tied up as a guaranteed inheritance for my beneficiaries.

    My retirement condo/home will be paid off by the time I'm 65 and that $150k will instead cover many years of my cabana boy's salary.
     
  4. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    I guess it wouldn't really be forking over $150K of your retirement. The way some people would look at it (if I have to guess), would be that they are taking the equity that is locked up in their home, putting some of it into a new, smaller home (via the "membership fee) with amenities geared toward where they are in life, and they can use the rest of the equity from their former home for their retirement. It would be one way for people who haven't saved enough for retirement to cash in on the equity in their home.

    It is probably a dumb way for most people, and I suspect it is a tough sell for this developer, but maybe I am missing something.
     
    Last edited: Mar 30, 2017
  5. Jssst21

    Jssst21 New Member

    I guess if the amenities are the draw they are pitching, and they set it as an alternative to a hefty HOA fee common in retirement communities, it becomes slightly less awful sounding. Around here, five hundred a month or more HOA fees are not unheard of in the more fancy pants communities. If you're paying twice that a year, but getting the money back in yer ten or so, there could, kind of, be an argument for some value to the approach - provided they aren't assessing more fees on top of the upfront. I'd still rather buy a unit ten times out of ten, but maybe that's the angle.

    Edit: It appears they charge a "monthly service fee" of $250, so the argument is pretty thin.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page