1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Things that irk you......

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by Chef2, Apr 20, 2017.

  1. Justin_Rice

    Justin_Rice Well-Known Member


    I'm sure we've got a Frequent Poster here who can clue you in to the joke I was making.

    ;)
     
    Baron Scicluna likes this.
  2. Vombatus

    Vombatus Well-Known Member

    PORN, man. PORN!!!

    Sheesh.
     
  3. CD Boogie

    CD Boogie Well-Known Member

    I do all my porn on the web, my man.
     
  4. Vombatus

    Vombatus Well-Known Member

    How many websites you on?
     
  5. CD Boogie

    CD Boogie Well-Known Member

    right this moment?
     
  6. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Click on the link, go to the end of the doc under "primary exempt purpose."

    http://www.espn.com/pdf/2013/0329/espn_otl_CathysKids2011.pdf

    It was a sham.
     
  7. bigpern23

    bigpern23 Well-Known Member

    I never said it wasn't a sham. In fact, I noted that if Jerry DeGregorio is the head of the foundation, it is highly suspect. The article should have quoted or referenced the organization's stated mission to support its claim. It's the reporter's job to give the reader the relevant information, not to make the reader sift through 10 pages of IRS forms to find it.

    Do you disagree OTL should have included that in its story?
     
  8. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    It did include that information in a perfectly economical way:

    "Some specific examples of what "Outside the Lines" found after conducting interviews and examining documents: NBA forward Lamar Odom's charity that promised money for cancer research has not given a dime in grant money to any cancer entity in its eight-year history."
     
  9. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    Professional sports teams who think they are creating "atmosphere" with their cookie cutter vinyl banners name-checking everyone from the captain to the backup long snapper. "Bob's Buddies" "Rick's Rowdies" "Samuel's Squad". Just don't.
     
    OscarMadison and Alma like this.
  10. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    Good point.
    Perhaps it was always intended to be used this way, but it has become increasingly common in its use.

    As for the half-game/game, if that is the case, which is a big if, it is a meaningless use of words that have a prescribed meaning.
    I can't file for a permit to build a 40-foot extension on my house when in my meaning 40 feet actually means 20 feet.
    There is a finite number of games played in a season. That number divided by 2 determines where .500 falls.
     
  11. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Those are usually charities.
     
  12. bigpern23

    bigpern23 Well-Known Member

    I disagree that sentence was perfectly economical. If it had added something like, "... according to tax documents filed with the IRS," I would agree with you.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page