President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Well-played.

 

Maybe just stand by quietly and watch as it gets Daniel Pearled.

 

That would require a modicum of personal responsibility on his part and even a tacit admission that he's not perfect and not everything is someone else's fault.

In other words, it is a stone-cold impossibility.

 

That's not much of veil on a shot at Trump.

 

Of all the zany things posted here, expecting Trump to resign/quit is the zaniest.

Dude has all the spotlight on him 24/7. It's his lifelong dream. He is never giving that up willingly.

 

That was my first thought as well. My second was that a movie has elevated him from the lowest of the low to status as a defender of the First Amendment. As if that was his primary motivation in "publishing."

 

Exactly. The more he is hounded, the more he can play the victim.

 

Trump should go on a three-month vacation. Maybe he'll feel more suited for the role upon his return.

 

Fuck you, New York Times. Fuck you, Katherine Rosman.

You had the chance to write a nice little feature on the Property Brothers, but you just couldn't let the opportunity to drag politics into it pass you by.

"They know that some of their fans are supporters of President Trump, but Jonathan is not a fan. “I believe our show is about finding solutions for the little guy, and I think the current administration is doing stuff that is counterproductive to serving the little guy,” he said." (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/10/fashion/the-property-brothers.html?ribbon-ad-idx=5&rref=fashion)

Go fuck yourselves, you whiny pieces of shit. That paragraph added nothing to the story, but I'm sure you quivered with joy at your courage in including it.

Everything does NOT have to be about politics.

 

Property Brothers have risen a notch in my eyes.

 

Except when, you know, the executive branch tries to incinerate the Constitution, which allows Congress to indict and convict and remove from office anyone guilty of the attempted incineration.

 

That is really an odd interlude in that article. If the guys were non-stop talking about Trump and the writer felt like it had to be in there, it should have been explained as such.