President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Financial-Crimes Monitor to Share Records in Trump-Russia Probe

 

Apparently good Christian Republicans never "get" diabetes. Perhaps the budget director should take a look at the map. What do the deepest red states have in common besides highest incidence of diabetes?
Diabetes in the United States: The State of Obesity

 

Two resign "in protest" from EPA subcommittee - CNNPolitics.com

"Two members of an EPA subcommittee have resigned "in protest" over the agency's decision to dismiss nine of the 18 scientists on a key science review board.
One of the two, Carlos Martin told CNN, "I can't be part of what I see is likely to happen in the future. ... I can't be a prop to bad science."

"Gretchen Goldman, research director at the Center for Science and Democracy asked, "What's the scientific reason for removing these individuals from this EPA science review board? It is rare to see such a large-scale dismissal even in a presidential transition."

She added, "The EPA is treating this scientific advisory board like its members are political appointees when these committees are not political positions. The individuals on these boards are appointed based on scientific expertise, not politics. This move by the EPA is inserting politics into science. "

 

Just to be clear, my "BTW" was intended to mean "by the way" ...

#I'mbetterthanMikeHuckabee

 

I didn't call him out. I simply pointed out that the Hail Hydra thing had already been posted. You really do fail at a stunning rate. Cue cis taking another dump on the thread with his fun-with-quote-function nonsense.

 

show your work.

 

Yeah. Scientists would NEVER get political. How do people say this stuff with a straight face?

 

Guaranteed he replies with, I'm not doing your work for you or I'm sorry you are to slow to keep up.

 

And others have pointed out the same thing. But -- stunner -- you don't get it.

 

Can't we just move on from the OOP-bashing? I want to talk about how much money I make.

 

Seems JC wants to handle both sides of the conversation by himself. When he gets to a part I consider relevant, should I help him out?