President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

One magazine cover story = the entire media is obsessed with Hillary Clinton?

Someone here is obsessed with Hillary Clinton, that's for sure. Ain't the media.

Let it go. You're not going to get your fastasy land wish of her running again and losing. But she will continue to give political speeches.

I assume every time she does you'll have the same freak out.

 

I got a feeling that both Bushes would rip Fucko a gaping new asshole if they spoke publicly.

One of the things Fucko is hell bent to demolish is GWBs AIDS prevention initiative in Africa, one thing that drew Pretty much universal support from everybody.

But it's spending government money to make life better for some non-rich people (mainly African mooslim neegros) so of course Fucko wants to destroy it and wipe it off the earth.

So he can loot the money himself. Remember, Fucko's fingers are in the cash box now so the end game of all the budget bullshit now is Fucko looting the Treasury directly into his bank account.

And Daddy Bush, of course, is old old New England money, so I'm sure Daddy Bush looks at Fucko as a 330-pound bag of oozing shit walking the earth.

 

Who are these articles being written for? Some of you obviously give a couple shits.

 

YGBFKM

Revisionist Starman is my favorite Starman.

 

Mitt Romney’s post-election life

Mitt Romney On Post-Election Life: 'It's Good To Live A Normal Life Again' | HuffPost

Romney, in interview, assigns blame for election loss and criticizes Obama

Romney Blames Loss On Obama's 'Gifts' To Minorities And Young Voters

https://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com...as-gifts-to-minorities-and-young-voters/?_r=0

 

The only reason X did Y was because of Z. X also did Y because of Q.

 

It is ironic that white supremacists seem to be the best argument against the concept.

 

We, as is those of us who follow SJ, are not the ones those articles are being written for. I'm not even sure you would care except YF posts it and gets called on it.

 

Must have been expounding on the virtues of Greg Harris and Paul Quantrill.

 

Called on what? Who cares that a handful of sore losers on the Internet don't want their candidate of choice to be mocked? Wouldn't be an issue if the national media could let it go. They're the ones providing the ammo. They're the ones you should be upset with.

 

Funny seeing the world's most Clinton-obsessed person wondering why others are still talking about a Clinton.

 

Except the "sore losers" aren't the ones posting about Clinton at every chance we get to a) further our obsession or b) detract everyone from the person who is leading our country every time he sticks his foot in his mouth, which is often.