1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Do we know how the shooter acquired his weapon? And while we're at it, why does anybody need such a weapon?
     
  2. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  3. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    He purchased it legally. And as to "such a weapon", on the scale of things it is a pretty unexceptional semi-automatic rifle. Not a sniper gun, not a big deal assault rifle, just a run of the mill type infantry rifle.
     
  4. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Nope. But I do think it's reasonable to make it harder for some people to acquire them. (Mental disorders, history of domestic violence, etc.)
     
  5. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Why do civilians need military grade weapons?
     
  6. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

  7. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

  8. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    I always wonder why gun control advocates don't just use Economics 101. If you want less of something, tax it. Local, state and federal taxes on firearms would result in fewer of them, especially as fewer people actually own guns now, but those that do own more of them. There is no possible constitutional issue with taxing a product that's for sale.
     
  9. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Taxation for the purposes of control used to be unconstitutional if control was unconstitutional. We undercut that for Obamacare tho
     
    YankeeFan and Hermes like this.
  10. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    I'll propose a $20,000-per-abortion tax ... no possible constitutional issue, right?
     
    SpeedTchr likes this.
  11. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    Mostly because they grew up playing Army as kids. They're often fun guns to shoot. If the owner is a vet, he trained on them, they are familiar and known to be effective.

    Need? No one outside the military or police really need them. You can defend your house just fine with a five shot 12 ga. pump shotgun. Your average home invader who hears the distinctive "clack-CLACK" of a pump shotgun pushing a shell into the chamber is headed for the door, right damn then.

    Then again, "need" is a slippery standard. You don't need a Corvette to get to work, either. It's a matter of want and taste and the freedom to choose. That's America, and I don't mean 'Murica. Guns are a difficult and different issue though, because some nut is unlikely to use his Corvette to kill people in job lots.
     
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2017
  12. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    How high of an abortion tax would you be comfortable with?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page