1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Fred siegle

    Fred siegle Well-Known Member

    I think I saw this in a season of 24.
     
  2. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    We didn't wake up every day with the POTUS making unhinged threats of nuclear war.
     
  3. QYFW

    QYFW Well-Known Member

    YAAF
     
  4. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    Count me as skeptical of how much of a threat NK poses. Our nation's history is deep of military and intelligence "sources" discussing how much of a threat some country is, what weapons it holds and the fundamental danger it poses to our country and way of life. Cripes, Cheney was genius at leaking stuff anonymously, then using the "anonymous" claims as evidence of the need to act.
    Real threats don't require a public relations campaign, they require action and if NK was an imminent threat yesterday, they would have been eliminated yesterday.

    I don't want to trivialize the potential threat - hell the Winter Olympics will be going on in six months less than 200 miles from Pyongyang - but it's kind of like Lou Holtz talking up an opponent.
     
    Last edited: Aug 9, 2017
    RickStain likes this.
  5. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    Trolling?
     
  6. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    North Korea is an existential threat to South Korea, a real threat to Japan, but only a worrisome pest to us. We have what, 6000 nuclear warheads. They're working on one. After what happened to Saddam, it's perfectly rational Kim would want a means of hurting the US enough that attacking him would not be worth it. North Korea has engaged in decades of attacks of various intensity on South Korea, usually in naval patrol boat conflicts, and breathes fiery rhetoric at it every day, but the armistice has held for 64 years now, because North Korea knows it'd eventually lose any all out war on the peninsula.
     
  7. CD Boogie

    CD Boogie Well-Known Member

    If only Joe Piscopo's career were alive to play Paul Manafort
     
  8. CD Boogie

    CD Boogie Well-Known Member

    That chicken is gonna meet the fire and the fury
     
    melock, dixiehack and HanSenSE like this.
  9. cjericho

    cjericho Well-Known Member

  10. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    We've never taken out a leader of a nuclear country. We take other leaders out like surgeons take out appendixes.

    Is it ANY wonder why leaders of U.S. enemies want nukes? It's the most rational desire they could have.
     
    RickStain, Stoney and Michael_ Gee like this.
  11. doctorquant

    doctorquant Well-Known Member

    Agreed.
     
  12. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    All he does is tweet. He's like a middle school girl. She knows everyone in the school but has no real friends just lots of acquaintances. so she just stirs things up with simplistic, jingoistic childish babble. There's no follow through on the tweets. He's all bark, no bite and has negotiated a substantive deal
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page