President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

So let me get this right. You believe that Trump is a vicious, cruel and overt racist ... who'd lie (and have his underlings lie) to keep people from knowing that he behaved in a vicious, cruel and overtly racist manner.

 

Well, back to basics: 5 Ws and an H. And no editorializing.

 

Yes, that's exactly right. Couldn't have put it better. Jeff Sessions will give a press briefing tomorrow on DACA. He will not take questions. They're evil racist pukes and they're gutless to boot.

 

Sure. We know Trump is full of shit.

The media is happy to report and catalog this.

The media must not also be full of shit, but when they are, this too should be reported and catalogued.

Michael is full of shit right now. The early clue was that he paraphrased and didn't include a link.

But now, confronted with actual reporting Michael is sticking to his story. The Trump administration must be lying, despite no competing claim that refutes what they say.

 

Every
Fucking
Word
Out of
Fucko
Is A Lie.

Deal with it.

 

Trying to report "facts" that will be acceptable to a group to whom "truth" is whatever they say it is, whenever they say it, is a fool's errand.

 

Just remember, when the huge explosion goes off and thousands are dead, Fucko is gonna come on teevee and say he knows who did it and who we have to kill.

You think that's the day he's gonna start deciding to tell the truth?

 

That's gonna get you a condescendingly vague smack-down from the PoMo caucus.

 

Venn Diagram Time!

1. Draw a circle containing the number of persons in the world who would personally benefit most directly from a mass-casualty attack in a major American city.

2. Draw another circle containing the number of persons who could order this to happen, execute it, and maintain significant confusion as to their responsibility.

Do the circles overlap?

Why yes they do!

 

Why do you do this?

Are there any facts to suggest this woman applied for and/or was turned down for a visa? Any at all?

If you want to argue that you, the people you support, or the media are better and/or more moral than him, I'm going to need to see some evidence.

If you just sink to his level* or defend those who do, you're just as bad as everything you claim to hate.

* of course I would argue that Trump is the one republican candidate who was unwilling to take the high ground and lose, while the democrats ran their usual playbook of lies.

That's the real reason he's hated. He was willing to fight, and to win, using the tactics of the left.

 

You mean overlap as in one-to-one, or overlap as in one is a subset of the other?