1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Shooting at Las Vegas casino

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by melock, Oct 2, 2017.

  1. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    Yeah, I meant to cut it off after five or so, but I forgot.
     
  3. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  4. SnarkShark

    SnarkShark Well-Known Member

    My shark faces the other way. I don't know whose shark that is.
     
    amraeder likes this.
  5. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    I get the point she's trying to make, but doesn't that also speak to the ridiculous level with which we've over-regulated fairly mundane things in this country?
     
  6. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    I've got more than 4,500 miles on a bike this year. It's not regulated at all - other than "follow traffic laws."
     
  7. typefitter

    typefitter Well-Known Member

    Let's say we're starting to have a sane conversation about guns and trying to make Americans safer. (I know, I know. Hear me out.) What if we started with no bump stocks, no silencers (wear ear protection), and no high-capacity magazines. Let's say you have a 10-round max. Would, say, 80 percent of Americans agree on that?
     
    Inky_Wretch likes this.
  8. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    I'd trade a cap on abortions at 20 weeks for some gun restrictions and background checks. Licensing would be great.
     
    SnarkShark likes this.
  9. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    'Thoughts and prayers' — and fistfuls of NRA money: Why America can't control guns

    "There is no better example of the corrosive effect of money on American politics than the spending of the National Rifle Assn.

    The gun rights organization spent a stupendous $54.4 million in the 2016 election cycle, almost all of it in “independent expenditures,” meaning spending for or against a candidate but not a direct contribution to a campaign. The money went almost entirely to Republicans to a degree that almost looks like a misprint (but isn’t): Of independent expenditures totaling $52.6 million, Democrats received $265.


    If you’re looking for a reason that politicians are quick to declare that their “thoughts and prayers” are with the victims of the horrific slaughters that have become virtually routine in American life, but do nothing further to stop them, look no further.
     
  10. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    I think most sane, non-gun crazy Americans would buy that. I'm not sure that figure would reach the 50% mark, not when it comes to "gun rights".
     
  11. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    The high-cap mag ban had majority support in polling a few years ago. The silencer deal is no big deal, gun lobby was pushing it - not gun owners. And bump stocks should have been banned years ago by ATF.
     
  12. Stoney

    Stoney Well-Known Member

    The question is not whether 80% agree, as much as it is whether 80% is enough to trump the will, money and tactics of the NRA.
     
    Inky_Wretch likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page