1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

U2: Overrated?

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by lcjjdnh, Dec 4, 2017.

  1. QYFW

    QYFW Well-Known Member

    At least DD was close.
     
  2. QYFW

    QYFW Well-Known Member

    Ignored.
     
  3. QYFW

    QYFW Well-Known Member

    Being a sophomore in high school when AJFA came out, I've listened to it more than any Metallica album. But if I had to pick just three, I'd replace it with Kill 'Em All.
     
  4. QYFW

    QYFW Well-Known Member

    Double ignored.
     
  5. QYFW

    QYFW Well-Known Member

    I like Rush.

    I was into metal AND psychedelia in high school. At least what I remember of it.
     
  6. QYFW

    QYFW Well-Known Member

    I'd have listened to Lawrence Welk on a loop if it got me laid in high school.

    There was a short period after I read "No One Here Gets Out Alive" that I was determined to become a drunken poet. But I didn't have the proper focus at that age.
     
  7. lcjjdnh

    lcjjdnh Well-Known Member


    Was wondering whether I could sneak Oasis on there—first two albums are classics—but thought Be Here Now might be a bridge too far. Love Klosterman’s review of it, though.

    Chuck Klosterman's Review of Be Here Now | Live4ever Forum
     
  8. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    Fuck that ginger boy lol. Be Here Now isn't a smash start to finish but it's strong.

    And the 3-song run of Don't Go Away, Be Here Now, and All Around the World is fantastic.
     
  9. typefitter

    typefitter Well-Known Member

    Plus I imagine you needed to eat.
     
  10. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    Even Noel Gallagher thinks "Be Here Now" kind of sucks.

    “People are prepared to have stand-up rows with me in the street: ‘I fucking love that album!’ And I’m like, ‘Mate, look, I wrote the fucking thing. I know how much effort I put into it. It wasn’t that much.”
     
    Hermes and YankeeFan like this.
  11. Double Down

    Double Down Well-Known Member

    To me, the contention isn't that U2 hasn't made good music, it's that they're in no way deserving of the quasi-religious devotion they seem to inspire. I know people who talk about that Super Bowl performance after 9/11 like they jerk off to it every Sunday. I admire bands that try to speak to something bigger than themselves, that are bold enough to tackle big themes. But to me, U2 has always seemed like they ought to have start out with Bono saying at the beginning of every album: OK BLOKES, HERE IS OUR NEW ALBUM THAT TACKLES BIG THEMES! There isn't a lot of subtlety in any of their music, and yet it's also incredibly vague!

    THIS IS A SONG ABOUT NUCLEAR WAR!
    This is also a song about nuclear war!
    This is a song about The Troubles.
    This is a song about MLK.
    This is a song about colonialism and America's disastrous intervention in Central America!

    Skies. Bullets. Blood Red Canyons. Clouds. Rockets. Etc.

    Someone wrote something once I thought perfectly captured why their songwriting is purposefully vague bullshit: Has there ever been a single character in a u2 song? It's always just "you" and "us." Now compare that to Springsteen or Dylan (or The Stones or Beatles).

    I actually admire earnestness (since I think cynicism is generally a safer emotion) so I should be right in U2 demographic, but there is something that just rings false about their whole deal.
     
  12. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    I would, too, if they had kept Kill 'Em All's original title, "Metal Up Your Ass."
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page