President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

What about North Korea?

 

Appears to be going well.

 

YF, when you talk about how the White House has made a statement refuting a story and we all laugh at your expecting us to believe them, this sort of thing is why.



I mean, seriously, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Pull the other one, it's got bells on.

"It could cost the President a lot of money". It could mean that I get a $2m tax refund too, but I don't think that's happening either.

 

Nancy knows legislative history as well as a Trump judicial nominee knows legal theory.

 

Neil Gorsuch just joined a long list of people not loyal enough to Donald Trump - CNNPolitics

 

Y'all are missing out on the big picture here.

The Storm Is the New Pizzagate — Only Worse

 

Have CNN, MSNBC, or CBS explained yet how multiple sources misread the date on the “bombshell” Trump Jr./Wikileaks email?

Have Reuters or Bloomberg explained how they “confirmed” the German newspaper’s report that Mueller had subpoenaed Trump’s financial records from Deutsche Bank?

Has ABC explained how Brian Ross’ source reported that “candidate” Trump ordered Flynn to contact the Russians?

 

LOL. Again, they’re not even claiming that their sources have direct knowledge of the conversation.

From the WaPo:

Trump, according to several people with knowledge of the Trump, according to several people with knowledge of the discussions, was upset that Gorsuch had pointedly distanced himself from the president in a private February meeting with Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), telling the senator he found Trump’s repeated attacks on the federal judiciary “disheartening” and “demoralizing.”, was upset that Gorsuch had pointedly distanced himself from the president in a private February meeting with Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), telling the senator he found Trump’s repeated attacks on the federal judiciary “disheartening” and “demoralizing.”

 

Has her influence grown since this came up a year ago? At the time, my characterization of her influence was absolutely fair despite QYFY's dishonest attempt to misrepresent my point of view.

Honestly, I'd never heard of her until she was brought up here by YankeeFan in one of his misleading attempts at a gotcha moment last year. Honestly. There's a word you can't apply to QYFY or YankeeFan on this topic.

 

Amazing how I was purposely ignoring her when I'd never even heard of her (a year ago).

Please let us know when you are ready to have an honest discussion. It would be a nice change of pace.

 

Which you will be saying until the moment a mushroom cloud goes up no matter how much bullshit President Trump stirs up. (Actually, that is not accurate. You'd still be saying it even after if given the opportunity.) Just as you won't acknowledge actions that were already in motion before he took office and their role in current outcomes.

The world according to YF: If it happens while a Republican is in the White House, he gets credit. If it happens while a Democrat is in the White House, the previous administration must have done it. To be fair, you aren't alone in that approach. You are perhaps just a bit more extreme in your hypocrisy.