1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Greatest books 1950-2000

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by heyabbott, Jan 10, 2018.

  1. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

  2. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    I've never heard of No. 1 or its author. Hopefully that doesn't make me an illiterate dunce.
    Also, not discounting the greatness of Poe works at all, but even if the book was published after 1950 should a collection of his works be on this list since he died in 1849?
     
  3. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    Ditto Chekhov, who died in 1904. And Kafka, who died in 1924.

    And isn't including "collections" in a best books lists a little suspect to begin with?
     
  4. Slacker

    Slacker Well-Known Member

    Massive fail. "Ball Four" is nowhere to be found.
     
  5. typefitter

    typefitter Well-Known Member

    I'm not judging, because I've read, like, two of these books. But I'm a little surprised you've never heard of One Hundred Years of Solitude. It's not a surprise pick or an unfamous book.
     
  6. typefitter

    typefitter Well-Known Member

    Agreed. It's like putting a Greatest Hits record on a list of best albums.
     
  7. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    I went to a conference of PR folks and the keynote speaker led with a quote from this book, then asked how many in the audience had read it. I shot my hand up since I had read it in high school and figured everyone else had, instead maybe four other hands went up in a room of 150 people. Outside of the likes of "To Kill a Mockingbird," I guess you just never know ...
     
  8. typefitter

    typefitter Well-Known Member

    I tried to read it last year. Couldn't keep anybody straight. I got to page, like, 50, and I wasn't sure if someone was fucking his mum or not, and I figured if I couldn't keep that sorted, I was doomed.
     
  9. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    I understand the need for a canon, but I hate ranking art. I love that the NYT doesn’t give stars to movies. These works should be enjoyed, thought about, talked about. What hits one person a certain way does not necessarily hit the other that way, if at all. Something may hit the same person in different ways depending upon their stage of life at separate readings.
     
  10. Hermes

    Hermes Well-Known Member

    I like it better when they give their picks for the top 100 and don't rank them. That seems like a useful list to make. Ranking them doesn't do much for me.

    And, yeah, they cheated by putting collections of long-dead writers on this list.

    Edit: It's created by an algorithm. That explains that.
     
  11. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    I of course read (some not all) of the Lord of the Rings trilogy, and I read Dune, and to put them on this list is a farce. Dune might not be in the top 50 sci-fi books of 1950-2000.
     
  12. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    I don't doubt that. I'm sure they didn't pull it out of thin air. And, frankly, I'm surprised myself that I haven't heard of it. I just never crossed paths with it in any of my high school or college lit classes, which is probably when most people read the types of books on this list.
    I haven't read more than a few of the books listed -- honestly, once you don't have to read them for a class, how often do you make an effort to go back to the classics -- but I've at least heard of a bunch of them or their authors.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page