1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Running 2018 college rings postseason thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Cosmo, Mar 1, 2018.

  1. Jake_Taylor

    Jake_Taylor Well-Known Member

    Mike DeCoursy had an interesting take on the First Four. He said if ESPN had won the bid we would have 96 teams in it by now. The First Four was a way to give Turner a couple more nights to broadcast without completely changing the fabric of the tournament.

    His opinion was he doesn't love the First Four, but it's a small price to pay to avoid ruining the whole thing with 96 teams.
     
  2. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    I love Villanova to win the whole thing but Purdue really scares me in that potential regional final.
     
  3. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    As I recall, the First Four was created because Coach K. thought too many major conferences coaches were losing their jobs for not making the tournament.
     
  4. Jake_Taylor

    Jake_Taylor Well-Known Member

    NC State worries me. Yurtseven is exactly the kind of player who has given KU trouble all year. And I think Keatts is going to wind up being a Hall of Fame coach.
     
  5. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Hell of a guy, too. Wrote a feature on him a couple of years ago when he was just getting going at UNCW and was very impressed.
     
  6. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    I'd be fine with 96 if you eliminated the NIT, which is just an experimental playground for the NCAA anyway. No one gives a fuck about the NIT. The major conference teams don't want to be there. The mid-major snubs don't want to be there.
     
    Donny in his element likes this.
  7. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    Alford better send K a nice bottle.
     
  8. Jake_Taylor

    Jake_Taylor Well-Known Member

    Yeah, I've known him since the first time he was at Hargrave. I used to love watching them practice because there was so much teaching going on. And with that talent he could have gotten away just rolling the balls out and letting them go.
     
  9. trifectarich

    trifectarich Well-Known Member

    68 teams was illogical when it was implemented and it still is, if for no other reason than the idea of giving every team the same requirements is thrown out the window. The NCAA tells 60 teams that to win the title, you have to win six games and you get three or four full days to prepare for your first game. Then it tells a few other teams that it's seven games to the title and, by the way, you get one full day of preparation twice in the first week.

    64 is better, always will be.
     
  10. Hermes

    Hermes Well-Known Member

    Sitting essentially parked on I-75 after an accident near the UD Arena exit last night also made me wish they'd only put 64 teams in the tourney.
     
  11. Flip Wilson

    Flip Wilson Well-Known Member

    Baylor hosted a first-round NIT game last night and beat up on some school called Wagner. Official attendance was 1,988, so the fans don't want to be there either, obviously.

    Edit: I just looked at the official box score, and it says: National Invitational Tournament (NIT) 1st Round.

    Should be National Invitation Tournament.
     
    da man likes this.
  12. da man

    da man Well-Known Member

    You are correct. People miss that all the time.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page