1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

'F--- Sister Jean'

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Dick Whitman, Mar 20, 2018.

  1. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    Was definitely speaking more as a matter of general principle.

    I can't say I got too worked up over the tweet itself. Didn't think it was funny, but didn't think it was a capital crime, either.
     
  2. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    "Shut up, you old bag!"

    It's quotably quotable!

     
  3. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    That's mostly where I'm at. I thought it was a little bit funny, though.
     
  4. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    I don't want it to sound like I'm taking the stance that calling anything a "joke" inoculates it against criticism or condemnation. But the important thing is, he didn't take any sort of actual personal shot against Sister Jean. Compare to, say, the board blow-up that occurred when Ragu implied that Al Franken's accuser was a whore because she had breast implants. That was a joke, too, and defended on those grounds, but I and others found it offensive because it was personal - it (arguably) implied that a victim of sexual misconduct was a lesser form of victim because she had implants. That she was asking for it.

    This was a general curse. It's totally different.
     
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2018
  5. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    I'm leaning toward Dick's take. This was, more than anything, a function of the easily offended failing to understand a silly tweet. It can't be called a nothingburger if social and conventional media blow it up into a somethingburger. But the original intent was not to degrade Catholicism.
     
  6. Slacker

    Slacker Well-Known Member

    Well, anyway, the priests took care of that, amirite? o_O
     
  7. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    *drum roll*
     
  8. Hermes

    Hermes Well-Known Member

    Every time I read this thread, I get MC5's Sister Anne in my head.
     
  9. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Haugh and the Tribune, not for nothing, seem to be very enamored of this Loyola team and run. I get it. The Bears suck. The Bulls suck. The Blackhawks suck. DePaul sucks. The White Sox suck. Illinois football sucks. Illinois basketball sucks. Northwestern unexpectedly sucked. Notre Dame didn't make the tournament. Loyola has energized the section, and it was much needed.
     
    QYFW likes this.
  10. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    How has the city as a whole embraced them? Just curious. This isn't like a Gonzaga situation, where it's essentially the only game in Spokane. There's a lot of sporting choice in Chi-town.
     
  11. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    My observation is that it's been a pretty big deal. It really is a college basketball town from way back, and I think people have long waited for one of the two city schools (UIC is there, as well, but they don't have the tradition of the other two programs) to rise again.

    If the Bulls or Blackhawks were in contention, I'm not sure you'd see the story embraced to this degree. But there hasn't really been a meaningful game played by a Chicago team since the Cubs lost in the NLCS.
     
  12. typefitter

    typefitter Well-Known Member

    What's funny and what's not funny is probably the most subjective thing in the world.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page