He's not a criminal, but a foreign combatant who declared war on this nation. If it's guilt by association, you shouldn't have associated with a terrorist group. He made a choice and he should pay for that choice. Let him rot there. It's a proven fact that quite a few of the released "harmless" combatants went right back to plotting attacks against the U.S. and its allies. Twenty-seven percent.Azrael said:YankeeFan said:But, of course, the Times knows there is more to the story:
http://projects.nytimes.com/guantanamo/detainees/43-samir-naji-al-hasan-moqbel
But not much more, if you read all the way through.
If this guy's such a strategic badass, maybe we should have charged him with something by now.
http://news.yahoo.com/apnewsbreak-gop-report-questions-detainee-release-050240359.html
Like Benghazi.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2205825/Sufyan-Ben-Qumu-Former-Gitmo-inmate-planned-al-Qaeda-attack-Libyan-consulate.html
I can't believe anyone believes his op-ed. A terrorist wouldn't lie, would they? According to Islamic texts, the answer is an emphatic yes. And reading the DoD's report, he lied several times when questioned.
There are two forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman. These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause Islam - in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/011-taqiyya.htm