1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Sports gambling legalized

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Big Circus, May 14, 2018.

  1. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    As has been mentioned, the "integrity fees" and everyone else who wants a hand in the cookie jar are going to be the factors that make or break this on the state level. If I have to lay -120 to bet a game, I'm not doing it very often because sports betting isn't beatable at that price. In that case, I'll keep hitting up friends who go to Vegas every few months to get down for me. And underground bookmakers will do even better business.

    And I wouldn't be too worried about Vegas. Sports betting doesn't make or break the town, on a profit basis it's far, far behind all the other forms of gambling in casinos. It's all about creating an atmosphere of a big sports weekend. Watching the first round of the NCAA Tournament out there is still a bucket list item for me, and that won't change just because I might be able to bet the games a few miles from home.
     
  2. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    I dunno. Sitting at a sports book in Vegas on a college football Saturday is a fun thing to do once in a while. But it's mostly because it is Vegas and it attracts all kinds of characters. Otherwise, if I was betting, I'd just as soon place my bet online or over the phone and watch at home or with friends. Put a sports book in Atlantic City or one of the casinos in Connecticut or around NYC, and it isn't going to draw me. But 1) I am not a huge bettor, and 2) Maybe I am not representative of most people.
     
  3. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    DraftKings said in a statement that it's been preparing since 2017 to offer sports betting, in anticipation of this ruling from the Supreme Court.

    I guess the states can make whatever rules they want. One winner someone I was listening to before pointed out could be race tracks. They'd let you bet on sports at the track. ... and while you're there, if you want to place a wager or two on the ponies, go ahead.
     
  4. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    I stayed at the Mandalay Bay on Friday night. The "resort fee" and parking added $45 to my one-night stay.

    (Rates at the Mandalay Bay seem to have gone down in the past year, though, for some reason...)
     
    YankeeFan likes this.
  5. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    Tune in to VSiN today, to say they're giddy is an understatement. Brent Musburger knew what he was doing when he signed up there.
     
  6. trifectarich

    trifectarich Well-Known Member

    I would imagine New Orleans would make a killing on the opening week of March Madness . . . or Scottsdale during the week of the PGA Tour event in town.

    But Moderator is absolutely dead on; if Vegas can offer games at -110 and everywhere else it's -120, the people who know what they're doing will pass. The key to all this is exactly how the states decide to monetize this. Who has faith in their state government to do this right?
     
  7. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    -120 bets are not cool.

    Though I don't know why Vegas would be exempt from that.
     
  8. Fly

    Fly Well-Known Member

    Marcus A DiNitto must be as happy as a pig in shit today.
     
  9. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

     
    Fly likes this.
  10. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    William Hill and all the big gambling parlors will be blowing up the phones to state legislatures. We'll see which states are smart enough to outsource to the right people and quietly take a cut, or try to do it themselves and make a huge mess. My state couldn't even run the DMV properly for many years, I don't exactly trust them to sell me a three-team teaser.
     
  11. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Would it make it more palatable for people if you had the standard 5 or 10 percent vig on a single game, and the states taxed winnings at the individual level?
     
  12. exmediahack

    exmediahack Well-Known Member

    This times 1000 or (times x110 or x120).

    With a -110 line, you have to win 52.38% just to break even. With a -120, that's damn near 55% to break even. No thanks. I'd rather play roulette with those terrible odds.

    If these states are offering lines that are -115 or -120 on both sides, the sharp players won't stay in Las Vegas or offshore. They'll only get the suckers or the degenerates.

    Just like they do for the lottery.

    So... that's what I anticipate they'll do.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page