1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Based on when we first started reading these posts . . .

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

  3. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

    God help us all.
     
  4. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  5. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    He should come in November for the parade.

     
    lakefront likes this.
  6. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  7. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Somebody sounds triggered ...
     
  8. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  9. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    I’d be ok with republican opposition to abortion if they could be consistent on government’s role in protecting life in general.
    You oppose abortion because human life is sacred and only God can make decisions of life or death. Yet you’re fine with the death penalty. You’re fine with gutting programs for child nutrition. And on and on.
    Did the baby arrive? Great. Now let her fend for herself.
    I’m ok with some restrictions on abortion. Particularly as medical advances change thinking about when a fetus is viable.
    I don’t think it should be easy to terminate a pregnancy.
    But if you’re going to beat your chest as the only party that defends family values and government’s role in protecting life, consider:
    * Opposing the death penalty.
    * Pushing back on candidates who think a woman’s place is in the kitchen. ( See Trumpist nominee in a district near Charlotte.)
    * Reinstating the assault weapons ban. (Look at mass murder events before, during and after the ban for guidance.)
    * Supporting programs that help the poor. Particularly young mothers and their kids.
     
  10. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    That is one tremendous photo.
     
  11. Steak Snabler

    Steak Snabler Well-Known Member

  12. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Yup. And regardless of whether you follow along with me, you should be thinking about this. It took the U.S. about 180 years to accumulate $1 trillion in debt. That was in 1982, when Reagan cut taxes and went on a spending binge. It took only another 27 years or so to get from $1 trillion to $10 trillion. Essentially the Greenspan regime, in which he did the bidding of politicians to create false economic booms to fuel their popularity (with the dot-com boom being the most memorable consequence of the debt mania it led to, as well as the mortgage / housing crisis). The $10 trillion mark happened in 2009. In just 9 more years, we are now at more than $21 trillion. And counting.

    Aside from the fact that that is fiscally unsustainable, in that period between 2009 and now, the reason we didn't drown in interest payments was the Federal Reserve monetizing that debt -- keeping nominal interest rates along the yield curve at ridiculously low and artificial levels. Basically, Soviet style economic management of our currency. Our government sells bonds -- the debt we accumulate. The biggest buyer of that debt during that period after 2009, until recently, was our own central bank! It is empowered to create dollars out of thin air (which has been how every empire in history has fallen), and it created trillions of dollars of that credit with the press of a button . . . . and used it to buy our own debt. It is insanity.

    This is unprecedented. So yeah, I am guilty of figuring there is no f'in way on earth that can go on indefinitely before it ends like all ponzi-like schemes do. I also know what I am looking at. Maybe they could monetize an insane amount debt longer than I every could have imagined. But the leverage and debt they have left in their wake, permeating all kinds of things, is not imaginary. There are going to be massive defaults. Ask yourself how you can borrow endlessly and create money out of thin air (i.e. create credit at your whim) to enable it. It's been silly season, whether people understand what they do or not. And there is a nasty price to pay at some point when confidence gives and people panic because there is an unsustainable debt and leverage problem that everyone got too deep into.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page