1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Stoney

    Stoney Well-Known Member

    Sorry, but Shottie and Slacker's defense was asinine. The best they could do was claim that it's impossible to plagiarize on a messagfe board, a non-existent rule they made up out of thin air.

    You know, this whole sordid detour might finally end if some of you pigheaded folk could just bring yourselves to admit that YF was actually right about something.
     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2018
    lcjjdnh likes this.
  2. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    He's probably jealous that they have more money than he's ever come close to owning.
     
  3. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Who had July 31st in the pool?

     
    garrow likes this.
  4. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

    Every week can be shark week thanks to populist tax cuts!

     
  5. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    already spoke to NRA?

     
  6. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member


    And, maybe Fred missed it, since it was embedded in a longer post, but here's where he admitted that he could not defend the similarities between the posts:

    This is a Joy Reid non-denial, denial. It's basically a no contest plea, and is as close to an admission as we're going to get.

    I'm not sure why anyone else continues to defend it, when the OP no longer will.[/QUOTE]
     
    Songbird likes this.
  7. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

    Trump to hold another rally today in Florida.

    Here's a live shot:

    [​IMG]
     
  8. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Didn't a court already rule that publishing the instructions/blue prints for printing a 3D gun is protected by the First Amendment?

    If that's the case, I'm not sure what people think they can do to prevent someone from printing their own gun (which won't be nearly as good as a gun you can legally purchase at the store).

    And, I'd find it odd if journalists are on the side of restricting this, as it's as much a speech issue, as it is a gun issue.
     
  9. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    It looks like the State Department settled a lawsuit, that they would have lost. So, a judge didn't rule on it, but I'm still interested to hear how you prevent the publication of instructions.
     
  10. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    And the NRA told him if he wanted to get some of their Russian rubles funneled into his campaign in 2020, he better STFU about it.
     
    HanSenSE likes this.
  11. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Hmmm...

    If the NRA is supportive of gun manufacturers, as opposed to gun owners, and the Second Amendment, wouldn't they be against this?

    If folks are printing guns at home, that can't be good for gun manufacturers.
     
  12. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    These 3D plastic firearms don't have unique serial numbers attached to them. That alone could make them illegal under ATF regulations.

    The number of firearms that will be printed at home that it won't affect gun manufacturers. But wavering from a full-on, wide-ranging opposition to any and all gun laws will hurt the 2A's ability to retain members.
     
    Donny in his element likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page