1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

MLB 2018-19 Offseason Thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Elliotte Friedman, Oct 4, 2018.

  1. bigpern23

    bigpern23 Well-Known Member

    Teams often look at the player opt-out as a detriment, but signing a Boras client to a 10-year deal with a 5-year opt-out is as good as signing a 5-year deal. Nothing wrong with paying Harper $30M/year until he's 31, letting him opt out, and letting someone else pay for his post-prime years.

    Hell, I'd offer him opt-outs after years 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 in exchange for one team opt-out after year 7.

    A non-Boras player changes the calculus, but Boras is always going to take his player to the market.
     
  2. Guy_Incognito

    Guy_Incognito Well-Known Member

    This is true, but only if the team is smart enough to bite. It killed me when the Yankees extended Arod & Sabathia when they opted out. They let you out of the worst part of their long term deals, and you re-up for more just to capture 1 or 2 more prime years? Maddening.
     
    bigpern23 and lakefront like this.
  3. MTM

    MTM Well-Known Member

    Do you agree with Bill James?


     
  4. Guy_Incognito

    Guy_Incognito Well-Known Member

    Couldn't we say the same about nearly everyone?
     
    Chef2 likes this.
  5. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Certainly about any "senior adviser" in any organization in human history.
     
    bigpern23 likes this.
  6. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    Rizzo gonna have some splainin to do if they lose Harper.
     
  7. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Why? Either Harper wants to be there or he doesn't.
     
  8. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    They were never gonna get him for 10/300. Why the lowball offer?
     
  9. Justin_Rice

    Justin_Rice Well-Known Member

    If they take the $30 million they had marked for Harper and spend it on the pitching staff instead, I'll be content.
     
    lakefront likes this.
  10. Justin_Rice

    Justin_Rice Well-Known Member

    Because they had to make a qualifying offer?

    (That's a question, not a comment)
     
  11. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    Nope.
     
  12. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Cleveland Indians prove that replacing their players doesn't make people want to come back and forget about the old ones.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page