1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BitterYoungMatador2

    BitterYoungMatador2 Well-Known Member

    lakefront likes this.
  2. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

  3. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

  4. Just the facts ma am

    Just the facts ma am Well-Known Member

    Signatures as identification went away twenty years ago. Is cursive writing still taught these days?
     
  5. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  6. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    I find this so wrong. I don't see Julian Assange as some kind of selfless hero, the image he would like to project. He's a self-righteous, egotistical shit stirrer. But he's not an American citizen, owes us nothing, and to me, the most telling thing about that article is that it reads like they are sitting around trying to figure out what charges they can create to indict him. Like they are after him, and it's not about justice, it's just about getting him by any means possible.

    I think this is such a bad look for the country, and it feeds the narrative that we are a bunch of hypocrites. We spout off about freedom, try to push our notions of freedom on the rest of the world, pontificate about the first amendment. ... and then we are going to turn around and essentially prosecute Assange for publishing truthful information? Whatever bad deed they cloak it in to try to create criminality, that really is all he did.

    It's so problematic, first because the government shouldn't be criminalizing what he does based on whether they like or don't like the information he published, which is what this comes down to. And secondly, because he's not an American citizen even. He doesn't owe the U.S. anything.

    As much as I personally don't like what it seems the Russians did in spreading misinformation, hacking some servers and e-mail accounts and making stuff public, my problem isn't with the information itself. Even the false propaganda. And to the extent Assange was their vehicle for getting stuff out there, he didn't do anything that should be criminal. Free flowing information is what makes a free society. People should be worried when the government starts to erode that in any way. It should be up to each of us to evaluate the sources of information, the truth of anything we see, etc. But not having the government decide what we can see, from whom, and under what circumstances. That is way more dangerous than Julian Assange is. As for Russia? If you don't like them hacking into your e-mail account and making you look bad, maybe protect your e-mails better? Or be careful about what you say in e-mail?

    Either way, from my perspective, anything we saw from dumps of her e-mails or John Podestas e-mails wasn't really a bad thing. It was just more information. People could take it for what it was worth. But free flowing information is never a bad thing.
     
    bigpern23 likes this.
  7. Tarheel316

    Tarheel316 Well-Known Member

    Great post Ragu. I totally agree.
     
  8. Vombatus

    Vombatus Well-Known Member

    Podesta and Clinton emails are one thing.

    But he provided a platform for releasing Manning and Snowden classified data dumps.

    I find it kind of bizarre that Assange has been prominent for what, 10+ years now, and they are just getting around to figuring out what they can charge him with? Uh, BS.

    I wouldn’t doubt the US IC has plans for YEARS (Bush, Obama and Orange Duce admins) on how to kill him and Snowden, given a chance. Why bother dragging these bodies to the US or GITMO? Courts, etc. Give them a platform to pontificate at trial? Bah. Give them the OBL treatment.

    How many Iraqis helpers died because of Manning?

    The damage Snowden did is really unquantifiable. Makes the country much more susceptible to another mass casualty attack.

    If you or your family were harmed from an attack that might have been otherwise rooted out and stopped in advance, you might think otherwise of Assange and his platform.
     
  9. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Espionage Act vs Free Speech.
     
  10. lakefront

    lakefront Well-Known Member

    In the Montessori system it is.

    Where are the signatures, used to compare to ballots, coming from. Are these the sigs we used to register? I sent in an absentee that I am sure was not used as my state had no close races. I would probably be disqualified, my signature, like many, has changed. Never mind the whole middle initial problem.

    Funny thing, I have heard people suggest that the older generations will be able to use cursif as code, the kids will have no idea what we are plotting!
     
  11. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    When you don't like the information someone publishes being made public, call it a national security issue, and stifle it. It's so ripe for authoritarianism at worst, persecution of political enemies at best.

    The Espionage Act is ridiculously broad. ... for a reason. It's illegal for anyone with "unauthorized possession" of "national defense information" to "willfully communicate" it "to any person not entitled to receive it" if the person "has reason to believe" that info "could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation."

    It's catch-all bullshit that tries to give the government a justification to trash the first amendment, especially good for when they get caught violating the Bill of Rights or get embarrassed somehow.

    As for Edward Snowden, Bradley Manning, I suppose they took oaths that they would keep things related to the work they signed on for secret. So if they violated what they signed on for -- even if in the case of Snowden, who I think did the rest of us a service by exposing how Big Brotherish the NSA has gotten -- fine, prosecute them. I can see a solid and principled position being that it was an act of civil disobedience, and being willing to except the consequences of what you think is an unjust prosecution in order to try to fix government malfeasance.

    Julian Assange doesn't owe us a thing, though. Someone brings him information. I'd rather a free society, where he is free to publish it, than a government that is given secretive authority to decide what is harmful and what isn't, with the authority to criminalize publication of information. That notion is about as unfree and unAmerican as anything I can think of.
     
    Last edited: Nov 16, 2018
  12. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page