1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

MLB 2018-19 Offseason Thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Elliotte Friedman, Oct 4, 2018.

  1. justgladtobehere

    justgladtobehere Well-Known Member

    I think your statement downplays overall changes in height and size. A change of a few inches and 20 or so pounds is a huge gain in baseball where length of arms and legs is so important. Also, what is important is what baseball players ate growing up, not what they could eat as professionals. I would guess that cheaper sources of protein available to everybody was very important for the increase in size.
     
  2. John B. Foster

    John B. Foster Well-Known Member

    I wonder how players today could handle playing in Ruth' era. Terrible ball fields, no body armor, no helmets, long train rides, many doubleheaders, fans throwing fruits, pillows, etc. at them while they're playing defense. The list goes on and on.
     
  3. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    If you're Harper or Machado, do you take 5-200 million right away from someone the first chance you get, or do you sit back and wait?
     
  4. swingline

    swingline Well-Known Member

    You wait. The market will come to them.
     
  5. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    If you're Kansas City, and Kennedy is still sucking by July, him and his 16.5 million will be gone from the 816 faster than a sandwich in front of Steve Balboni.

    I don't care if you have to package him up with Starling......get them the hell out.
     
  6. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Harper already turned down a $300 mil deal.
     
  7. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    But the days of the albatross contract are gone. No one is getting the 13-year monstrosity that Stanton got.
     
  8. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    For 10 years with no opt-out.
     
  9. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    If that 10- years is for 7 or even 8 with a player option after 3 or 4, he would have signed.
     
  10. Hermes

    Hermes Well-Known Member

    I think their real problem would be when their paychecks arrived.
     
    John B. Foster likes this.
  11. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    Story I saw earlier this fall was Harper's number was 10-350.
     
  12. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    I'd take it. You're 31-32 at that point and can get another big deal if you live up to the hype. 40 million a year is a lot to turn down.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page