President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

To be clear: Arguing abortion here isn’t going to change minds. Really. I’m more interested in the conditions that people are allowed to be in or out of the conversation.

 

And what is the authority for the federal government to take the position that it has co-sovereignty?

 

So *maybe* we'll get a couple of more 6 a.m. raids tomorrow.

 

This is the textbook definition of arguing in bad faith.

 

This is getting to be a running question. How many of these have we seen now?

 

LOL. Do tell.

 

Mitch McConnell is watching you defame our president.

 

Shanty Mick was the granny-starver of all granny-starvers in congress. He doesn't want the government to spend 10 cents on any other purpose than licking billionaires' asses.

 

We were talking specifically about the definition of "necessary for mental health" as applied through the law we were talking about.

But to go in your direction, it depends on the context. As a general guideline that may or may not apply to every individual situation, lately I'm a believer in staying in one's lane. There's plenty of women out there who can argue with the minority of women who are anti-abortion.