1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    I never would have thought The National Enquirer was essentially a for-profit J. Edgar Hoover.
     
  2. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    She's already a force. For now. The Democrats in Congress would clearly prefer she kept a lower profile and went about learning the daily life of a congressperson (which she couldn't possibly know before she got there). But I don't think that's in the cards.
     
  3. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Obviously. You don’t challenge someone to release these if you’re hung like a hamster.
     
  4. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    No, they don’t.
     
  5. Vombatus

    Vombatus Well-Known Member

    I laughed.
     
  6. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  7. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  8. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  9. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  10. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

  11. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Eat the rich?

    Opinion | Abolish Billionaires

    New York Times & Farhad Manjoo -- His Column about Billionaires Is Stupid | National Review

    This founding father's fears about America's future feel pretty darn prescient today

    As we grapple with the ongoing failure of our economy to distribute wealth in accord with our egalitarian expectations, Adams’ legacy remains valuable nevertheless, for it helps us frame our analysis more historically and realistically. For once you realize that equality is the exception, not the rule, in a capitalistic society, the question changes. It is not “How can we free the marketplace from government regulations and increase productivity?” It is instead, “How can we free ourselves from our illusions about the free market in order to assume a more equitable distribution of wealth?”

    Adams invites us to think about the meaning of the word “republic,” from the Latin meaning “public things.” Do we believe, as he did, that there is a public interest beyond the reach of markets and majorities of the moment? Are we a society composed of winners and losers, givers and takers, or is there some larger status we share collectively as citizens?

    These are the questions Adams posed, in his cantankerous way, for posterity—which now, more than ever, is us.
     
  12. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

    The thought that Americans might actually be angry at the billionaire class is scaring the shit out of Fox News.
     
    TigerVols likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page