1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    I'm with Ragu on this.

    It'd be better if government pulled entirely out of the higher ed business, guaranteed nothing, made the banks do it, and, when the banks balked on backing loans for kids with 2.9 GPAs, the schools would be forced to lay off all the mid-level administrative suits and reduce tuition.
     
  2. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    So I’m sitting in Chemotherapy with my wife for the 24th time this year. And it occurs to me that I’ve never seen a single God damn pro-lifer offering support. I’ve never seen a single Christian go out of their way to help a stranger in need. After 24 weeks of seeing old and young, male and female, black, white, Asian, Hispanic ... I’ve never once seen a fucking pro-life evangelical Christian show up to a help a single soul. This is the only non hospital chemo location in an areas of 400,000 people. Not a single conservative has the fucking ability to put their fat asses where the fat mouths are
     
  3. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Your education was heavily subsidized by others. Of course it was wonderful for you. Not so much for the people who actually had to pay for more than half of it (if you are typical of a Canadian student).

    Also, I am not sure exactly how old you are, but would your work-your-way-through-grad-school path work today? Higher education isn't all that cheap, at least at the more prominent Canadian universities, even with the heavy subsidization.

    Canadians are taxed at a level Americans won't accept, which covers some of that subsidization, although really just like every fantasyland in the world, Canada has been a story of escalating debt -- both at the government level as the socialized promises of free stuff have proven impossible to keep (even if it takes time for reality to catch up), but also at the household level, where household debt levels in Canada have gotten downright scary relative to America, in part I believe because people can't make ends meet due to the heavy level of taxation that doesn't even pay for all the "free" stuff Canadians have always seemed so proud of.
     
  4. goalmouth

    goalmouth Well-Known Member

    New vagina in town. Love the working girl 'do.

     
  5. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Yes. Canada has pissed away all that money on education and health care when they could have been spending it on prisons and weapons systems.
     
  6. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Stories from just one hour ago.

    Canadian household debt-to-income ratio rises in Q2 - BNN Bloomberg

    Come on, that post is just wrong, Az.

    What I said was that Canada hasn't made anything remotely free.

    There are a lot of taxes (at a level Americans won't go for), consumer debt levels there have gone through the roof (what is likely to cause their next crisis) as people have been increasingly forced to borrow to meet their living expenses, and to the extent that has led to some subsidized services for Canadian citizens, the quality of those services often isn't on par with what you can get in the U.S. With all our warts, and how we have screwed up the markets we're talking about, to the extent we still allow some entrepreneurship that other countries don't, we really shine when it comes to certain service industries.

    America having too many prisons, a fucked up justice system, a bloated, unnecessary military, military industrial complex, etc. (and dozens of other things you could also point out) has zero to do with that reality.
     
  7. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  8. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Dangerous. This assumes that everyone who wants to be a welder can find high paying welding jobs.
    This is the mindset that has helped kill education.
    Now that it has been weakened by Trumpist /SEC state legislatures, it is prime for attack. Perfect.
    College is still the best way of securing a future. It has become too expensive at state institutions because Trumpist ideology has whacked an average of 16% of state funding. The solution is not to encourage everyone to become a plumber but to fund these colleges.
     
  9. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    I do think there is a difference between being "free" and something being debt free. Student loans should be capped at a certain amount. Cap loan amounts to $15k a year and some schools will suddently become a lot more affordable. The name brands will still charge whatever they want - but Directional-directional-State or LiberalArts College will figure they can do without bells and whistles.
    It's not like all colleges are doing well. A lot of them are fighting for survival.

    How many colleges and universities have closed since 2016?
     
  10. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    The real republicans and Conservatives send their kids to private prep schools while promoting home schooling and for profit charter schools. They are advocating vocational training in lieu of university educations. It is intended to foment literal class divisions in the country. In 2 generations there will be a landed gentry, a professional class and everyone else. In 4 generations there will be a violent uprising. And the US in the mid 2100’s will make the French and Russian revolutions look like a boys scout water ballon fight.
     
    OscarMadison likes this.
  11. Oggiedoggie

    Oggiedoggie Well-Known Member

    Now that I’m more of a geezer, set in my ways and used to routines, I’m beginning to believe that rapid sweeping changes on any broad-based system (be it healthcare, immigration or education) are fraught with the potential for errors and unintended negative consequences.

    I think that the better approach would be more of an agreement of what goals should be accomplished, then steady measured steps toward that goal.

    It might be that a better America could be found somewhere at a point between what we have now and “free” college, healthcare or immigration (or what we have now and an impenetrable wall).

    That might not be possible now that the Democrats seem to run screaming to the left during the primaries and the face of the GOP is a self-obsessed jingoistic isolationist nationalist shill for corporate interests.
     
  12. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    Oggie, that's how the system works in practice. Presidents run and get elected by aspirational proposals, but progress towards the aspirations is determined by Congress and the courts. As a result, much of our government seems kludgy because it is built to produce kludges. If Warren or Sanders is elected, they'll be lucky if they can add a public option to Obamacare, forget Medicare for All. Works both ways. Republicans controlled the White House and Congress in 2017-2018 after an election where they promised to repeal and replace Obamacare. They couldn't, because the national friction of the system stopped them.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page