1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

  2. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

    Dear Penthouse:

    I never thought this would happen to me, but it finally did this December. I'm a Congresswoman....and also a Russian asset. Because of that, it is so hard to meet people I can trust in Washington. Well, as luck would have it, the President is also a Russian asset! This had never happened before, so I was excited.

    The problem was, he and I are in different parties (and I am from a state whose most famous native, the President really hates) so I didn't know the best way to catch his eye.

    As luck would have it, I got my chance on December 18, 2019. My colleagues in the House decided to impeach the President. I mean what are the odds an unqualified, unfit, corrupt, foreign asset would get impeached?

    Anyway, my chance to shine came when I voted present rather than yes or no on the articles of impeachment like a normal representative. My ploy worked perfectly. The President noticed me! He sent a perfect tweet which is a big deal in his world.

    Then I got invited to the White House Christmas party where the President asked me to visit the Lincoln Bedroom with him. He started by saying that most people don't know Lincoln was in the same party as him and that most of his supporters think Lincoln wasn't as good as a president.

    We sat on the bed as it wheezed from our body weights and then...
     
    Slacker likes this.
  3. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    It’s closer to protecting it, or, more to the point, calling out Christian defenders of Trump. There was a “if you defend this man the world will stop listening to you” vibe to it. It was a little overheated, too, in the sense that the fate of Christian testimony in the world rested on Trump’s removal. It doesn’t, of course. This was an EIC who is retiring in a month, wanted to say exactly what he wanted to say, told three people, wrote it in an hour and posted it.

    To the extent that Trump should be removed from office for being a racist, immoral ass, I agree.
     
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2019
  4. 3_Octave_Fart

    3_Octave_Fart Well-Known Member

    That has been conveniently omitted from the narrative - that the chickenshit is retiring in January.
    Many of these people find odd moments to discover conviction. Posterity won't be confused.
     
    wicked likes this.
  5. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  6. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  7. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    “But if there was a quid pro quo, they would have stopped the aid within 90 minutes, so Trump is innocent, and this is all a Dummycrap Coup with the help of the Fake Newz Mediuh!” —- next dumb Republican talking point.
     
  8. BTExpress

    BTExpress Well-Known Member

    Gabbard has voted AGAINST Trump's position in 80.5 percent of her votes.

    Chuck Schumer has voted against Trump's position 77 percent of the time.

    Facts do not matter here. Congratulations.

    Tracking Congress In The Age Of Trump
     
  9. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  10. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    According to 'yab, it is insanity to see the stupidity of people who think they can oppose President Trump and his supporters while playing right into their hands.

    Even if you are too stupid to see that, you should understand that attacking a 13-year-old boy for the sins of his father is, at best, useless.
     
  11. Pilot

    Pilot Well-Known Member

    So you honestly think Tulsi is a more devout Democrat than Schumer?

    Tulsi cast her lot when she cozied up to Trump in 2016 to try to land a cabinet position. Her vote in impeachment, or lack thereof, was purely a move of self preservation. She can’t vote against it because she has to string along some of her followers and she can’t vote for it because that would potentially be disqualifying for whatever she’ll actually do next, like work for FoxNews.
     
  12. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Yet when it was time to do the right thing, she chose to do the selfish thing and help him instead. Of course, any potential Russian asset will automatically have you as a supporter.
     
    wicked likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page