1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

    The New York Times wouldn't name him. Neither would the Washington Post. Nor a metric fuckton of legitimate news outlets.

    On the other hand, we have you here going "DURR DO YOU EVEN DO JOURNALISM BRO?"
     
    Mr. Sluggo likes this.
  2. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

  3. Neutral Corner

    Neutral Corner Well-Known Member

  4. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    Well, in normal times, legitimate reporters would be asking why the “whistleblower”’s name has to be kept super secret when there is no precedent for it.
     
    Vombatus likes this.
  5. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  6. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    It's up to the Senate to do the Senate's job. This is the first impeachment trial in the country's history with no witnesses except for three judges who resigned before the trial began. Stop with the bullshit. You're down with Trump shredding the Constitution to own the libs. That makes you a traitor in my book.
     
  7. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

  8. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

  9. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    06CBB3E5-7486-4FA5-8EE8-48140907FEEE.jpeg
     
  10. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    So if these witnesses are so important, why didn’t the House follow the traditional process that would have allowed them to subpoena said witnesses instead of just requesting they appear. Schaffer’s and Co. kept saying they had a strong case. If it was so strong, why did they need new witnesses?

    You’re not usually this intellectually dishonest.
     
    Vombatus likes this.
  11. Scout

    Scout Well-Known Member

    If your guy wins the election, he does what he wants if you have one of the two houses.
     
  12. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Because your boy in the White House blocked them from appearing.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page