1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

NBA 2019-20 thread.

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by DanOregon, Oct 7, 2019.

  1. Tweener

    Tweener Well-Known Member

    I forgot about the extension he signed last August. My mistake. I think you have to consider trading him before he tanks his own value. He’s still a solid player but not max-level, IMO.
     
  2. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Players get A fixed percentage of revenue, would you rather see that money in the owners pocket?
     
    sgreenwell likes this.
  3. HappyCurmudgeon

    HappyCurmudgeon Well-Known Member

    You and I both. I thought he was heading into a walk year. His $100 M/4 contract kicks in next year. That's going to be a hard one to trade.
     
    Tweener likes this.
  4. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    That's not the problem. A $10 million dollar salary is often much easier to trade than a $2 million salary. The Lakers can't move Kuzma because he only makes $2 million and it's impossible to get anything back for him and make the salaries match.

    I think the Warriors are going to be far more interested in getting actual players instead of draft assets. They're back in win now mode next season and this is a shit draft coming up. Draft assets shift them into a long game that they aren't playing right now, unless they can flip them immediately.
     
    Tweener and HanSenSE like this.
  5. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    With Thompson and Curry out, it's been 82 sessions of Kerrball 101 for the younger players. I don't expect this team will be down long.
     
  6. Webster

    Webster Well-Known Member

    Draymond is a complimentary player, but the Warriors really run through him.
     
    Tweener likes this.
  7. TigerVols

    TigerVols Well-Known Member

    Never before in the history of SJ has the first half of one question so proved the second half.
     
    Michael_ Gee and sgreenwell like this.
  8. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    The Warriors are also a pretty good bet to land a vet at below market price. It's not the guaranteed ring like it used to be, but I'm guessing there are a few players with more than $200m in earnings tired of playing meaningless games half the year.
     
  9. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    I'd rather see LeBron and Steph and other players people actually pay to see earn that extra $5-10m a year, than the Allan Crabbes and Nik Batums of the league.
     
  10. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    I agree with that but then you need to get rid of the individual max.
     
  11. sgreenwell

    sgreenwell Well-Known Member

    ... which the union rank and file won't agree to. Damn socialists!
     
  12. sgreenwell

    sgreenwell Well-Known Member

    Hey, we've got a trade! And it's a bizarre four-teamer, like a hypothetical you make in the trade machine. I was attempting to summarize it here, but fuck, too many moving pieces.

    I like the trade for Houston, because I think Capela is overrated, and Bell can probably do similar things to him, while Covington helps them in the playoffs. The Hawks already have John Collins, so I'm not sure why they need Capela too.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page