1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Gannett, Gatehouse talking merger

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by SoloFlyer, May 30, 2019.

  1. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

    If I got laid off, the good news is I can go bag groceries and still make the same money.
     
    2muchcoffeeman and MovingOnOut like this.
  2. MovingOnOut

    MovingOnOut New Member

    Thank you, I'm ticked off too. Moreso at the industry as a whole than anything else. I knew I'd be laid off at some point, just not this soon after I'd worked my butt off to prove I was essential.
     
  3. LanceyHoward

    LanceyHoward Well-Known Member

    I offer this as evidence of my statement that the management of Gannett does not believe that newspapers are dying and their strategy is to pump the blood out of them.

    According to Business Insider Gannett's debt agreement prohibits the company from spending more than 60 million dollars annually on capital expenditures. In FY 2018 Gannett spent 63 million dollars on capital expenditures and New Media Incorporated 11 million dollars. From the anecdotes I read on these threads I don't think either company was investing a lot of money in new systems to improve their websites in 2018. And the merger agreement specifically required them to cut expenditures.

    If management had really thought the papers would survive would they have agreed to a deal that basically that severely limits their ability to invest in the product?
     
  4. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    From the Poynter story - a very Gannet quote from a PR flack.

    “We remain steadfast in our efforts to integrate our new company in order to realize the full potential of our combined resources and scale to sustain and preserve quality journalism for the long-term. The moves, while imperative, are tough. The elimination of any job and the loss of valued colleagues is deeply felt.”
     
  5. Severian

    Severian Well-Known Member

    I would LOVE to find out.

    The difference is you'd be a wage slave, clocking in and out and needing to ask permission to use the bathroom. I bagged groceries growing up. It was an easy job, but the constraints were unbearable.
     
  6. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

    I'm closer to 50 than 40 and I'd probably be hired on as a team lead as a minimum, but yeah, some retail experiences are better than others.
     
  7. Twirling Time

    Twirling Time Well-Known Member

    Another thing I will point out is GannettHouse likes to wait until the end of the pay period to drop the ax to make everything nice and tidy. So apparently if you made it past last Friday, you're good to go for two more weeks.
     
    bumpy mcgee likes this.
  8. FileNotFound

    FileNotFound Well-Known Member

    Not that I don’t think your point is solid, but most of Gannett’s technology is externally hosted, so it would be an operating expense, not a capital expense. What they won’t be doing is buying any fancy buildings or new presses, like, ever.
     
  9. JBHawkEye

    JBHawkEye Well-Known Member

  10. hondo

    hondo Well-Known Member

    On the other hand, when you clock out, you're done.
     
  11. SoloFlyer

    SoloFlyer Well-Known Member

    No one is essential in this business.
     
  12. Severian

    Severian Well-Known Member

    True. Though, there are many other non-minimum-age jobs that provide that work-life balance.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page