1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Will COVID-19 be the needle that finally bursts the sports bubble?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by BitterYoungMatador2, Apr 2, 2020.

  1. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member


     
  2. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Don't know what to think of this count of 13 Longhorns testing positive.
    In general, a cohort of 100 or so people tested by mandate should have a lower positive % than the population at large, which largely tests voluntarily and only after feeling sick and fearing they need to know. Right?
    On the other hand, the college football population might be different than your average cohort of 100 because of hometowns, etc.
    Would love to know what large universities are saying internally about what they anticipate their case counts will be once they start up again in August.
     
  3. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    Lots of college teams having positive tests.

    Yet two weeks into the return of the PGA Tour, and zero positive tests.
     
  4. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    I wonder if we’ll see high schools announcing positive tests in athletes? Or will school districts keep that info locked down?

    Schools here are now running practices. Even as positivity rates are climbing. Odds have to have a kid testing positive somewhere in the state.
     
  5. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    Texas has had about two dozen schools in the past 10 days announce either athletes or coaches have tested positive and they were shutting down workouts for two weeks
     
  6. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    They may not have a choice under HIPPA.
     
  7. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    What will be interesting, too, is if they actually do start the season and stick to the guidelines laid out by the state activities association. A positive test calls for a 14-day quarantine not only for the person testing positive, but anyone they came into contact with -- so basically, the entire team if not the entire school.
    So if a player tests positive, you could wind up with a team having to forfeit two or three games while the quarantine plays out. It seems a given that somebody will either cover up a positive test; ignore the guidelines entirely and falsify the data; or wind up having their season sunk by some sophomore lineman who showed up to practice with a slight fever.
     
    I Should Coco and Inky_Wretch like this.
  8. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Covering up positive tests -- but not faces -- will be the norm in many locales. If the quarantine policies are as strict as you say, there's no way a team can play.
     
  9. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    My brother the athletic director in California says he's been in meetings for weeks. This is going to be a district-by-district decision. One district 35 miles from him is opening for practices. Another 20 miles to the south is opening a week later. His district is not at this time.

    When I see him Sunday, I'll ask him about if high schools will announce positive tests. Guessing not. He's wondering if he has to be there to test athletes as they come into controlled practices. It's a crap show.
     
    Inky_Wretch likes this.
  10. Batman

    Batman Well-Known Member

    We have four high schools in town, two public and two private, that have started practice over the last two weeks. I've done stories on them as they started and noted what I've seen.

    The first private school didn't necessarily have a "fuck it" attitude, but the coach admitted how hard it is to police everything. He had several kids drinking from a hose during a water break, for example, even though they'd been told not to. The second private school was a little better, but the coach admitted there was a lot of learning as they went. They also had to work out in the gym because the field was too wet.

    The two public schools seemed to be the best. Each kid at both schools had individual water jugs, they checked temperatures when kids arrived, they were doing everything outside, one coach hustled to retrieve some kids who wandered into the field house during a water break, and I saw another spraying down some weight plates that they had brought out for a drill.
    They still weren't exactly socially distanced, though. They were broken into groups, but were relatively close to each other and close to 100 people came together for a quick huddle at the end.

    The smaller schools are going to have the hardest time, simply because they don't have the manpower to police everything. Some schools might only have two coaches to watch over 30 or 40 players. Our bigger schools have 10 coaches for 80 or 90 players. It's like the larger debate going on, where you have the theory of what you're supposed to do and the reality of what actually works and is feasible to do. Some of the guidelines are unrealistic, if not impossible, to maintain. I suspect everyone is on their toes right now to do everything right, but that standards will inevitably slacken as we go along.
     
    Inky_Wretch likes this.
  11. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

  12. tapintoamerica

    tapintoamerica Well-Known Member

    Exposure is a term with a lot of meanings and contexts in this whole deal. Is the school with two coaches supervising dozens of players at special risk for litigation in the event of a serious illness or worse?
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page