Fact-checking the Wall Street Journal

. . . is a source of concern for employees of the Wall Street Journal.

Over 280 Wall Street Journal employees raise credibility concerns about opinion page

More than 280 journalists, editors and other employees at The Wall Street Journal sent a letter to their publisher expressing concerns about misinformation in the paper's opinion section.

The letter says that “opinion’s lack of fact-checking and transparency, and its apparent disregard for evidence, undermine our readers’ trust and our ability to gain credibility with sources.”

Among several examples, the employees cite a column by Vice President Pence in which he said fears of a second wave of coronavirus cases were "overblown" and argued that the administration's handling of the pandemic has been a success. They said editors failed to adequately fact-check the piece, which was later corrected.

 

Did the employees have any issue with the credibility of opinions they agreed with?

 

uh oh, looks like the WSJ newsroom is running the Op Ed page

Another example was a reportedly highly-trafficked column titled “The Myth of Systemic Police Racism,” by Heather Mac Donald, a conservative commentator. The Journal employees said the article “selectively presented facts and drew an erroneous conclusion from the underlying data.”

“Employees of color publicly spoke out about the pain this Opinion piece caused them during company-held discussions surrounding diversity initiatives,” they wrote, adding that if the “company is serious about better supporting its employees of color, at a bare minimum it should raise Opinion’s standards so that misinformation about racism isn’t published.”

 

The Op-Ed side of the paper responds.

Opinion | A Note to Readers

“It was probably inevitable that the wave of progressive cancel culture would arrive at the Journal, as it has at nearly every other cultural, business, academic and journalistic institution. But we are not the New York Times. Most Journal reporters attempt to cover the news fairly and down the middle, and our opinion pages offer an alternative to the uniform progressive views that dominate nearly all of today’s media.”

 

There was more whine in the note to readers than there is in Robert Mondavi’s basement.

 

Whining? No. Arrogance? Plenty.

 

Derecka should definitely report on this.

 

Lots of publisher's boilerplate in there. Sulzberger's statement in the middle of the Bennet thing sounded the same notes.

"progressive cancel culture," but in the newsroom of the Wall Street Journal?

That's interesting.

 

Can The Federalist help?

 

I bet it can!

 

I doubt it's quite that strong.

But really? It's The Wall Street Journal. Publishing a work by Heather Mac Donald is sort of par for the course. Where did these reporters think they worked?

This, to me, is closer to the Gen Y/Z thing of "so, yeah, I don't like your values, methods and conclusions , but, um, I work here, and instead of me leaving, can you change? (enthusiastically) So let's make that happen!"