1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2020 MLB Running Thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Elliotte Friedman, Jul 24, 2020.

  1. Huggy

    Huggy Well-Known Member

    Totally agree on the seven-inning doubleheader, Jays have played a few of them and I have enjoyed watching them.

    Still not sure where I stand on the extra inning tiebreaker but the universal DH needs to stay
     
  2. Huggy

    Huggy Well-Known Member

    Will never NOT be funny.
     
  3. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    Actually I'd like to see the 7 inning doubleheader format stay and go back to no-DH in National League parks.

    The "compressed" game format would probably serve as incentive for managers to try double switches, one run strategies, etc etc, earlier in games.
     
  4. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    As far as the extra innings scenario, I'd go to a "Three Option" plan: each half inning the offensive team can choose from the following options:

    1) Runner on first, no outs.

    2) Runner on second, one out.

    3) Runners on first and third, two outs.
     
  5. Regan MacNeil

    Regan MacNeil Well-Known Member

    Statistically, you're always better off choosing Option 1.
     
    Fred siegle likes this.
  6. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    Probably, but different managers would try different options depending where they were in the order, platoon matchups, pinch hitters available, home vs away, etc etc.
    Which creates more interesting options for fans.

    Imagine a team choosing Option 3 and then going for a delayed double steal.

    One thing is certain; you'd see some wild shit out there.
     
  7. ChrisLong

    ChrisLong Well-Known Member

    The Angels would fail regardless of which option they picked. Except they did win in 11 last night when Shohei delivered a single with Trout on second and two outs. That was after, in the 10th, they did successfully sacrifice, but couldn't get the guy in from third with one out.
     
  8. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    They have been beyond difficult to watch.
     
  9. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    I just saw that Trout had his 300th homer. Quietest 300 ever? The best player in the bigs, and people forget he's in the lineup every day.
     
    maumann likes this.
  10. Della9250

    Della9250 Well-Known Member

    Even though there's "only been 151 players to hit 300 homers, I think 400 is where people really take notice -- that number is 57 and I think it still really means something.

    Chris Davis needs five for 300. Jay Bruce has 318.

    There's a lot of guys in that 300-399 range that you either go who? or he hit that many? whereas you get to 400 and there's like one or two outliers
     
  11. ChrisLong

    ChrisLong Well-Known Member

    Trout now owns the record for homers as an Angel. Tim Salmon is Mr. 299.
     
    MileHigh and maumann like this.
  12. goalmouth

    goalmouth Well-Known Member

    Cool...in a tawdry, Bill Veeck kind of way. What happened to acting like you've been there before..?

     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page