Muh Muh Muh My Corona (virus)

The ones I've seen noted that: 1) the two had allergic-reaction histories; and 2) the reactions were handled with the usual epi-pen business.

 

It was, in fact, predicted by the trial. Their data noted that 0.6% of people who got the Pfizer vaccine and 0.5% of the people in the control group had an adverse anaphylactoid reaction.

It is also completely standard in the administering of vaccines. A 15-30 minute wait after vaccination to make sure there's no severe reaction is industry-standard advice for all vaccines.

 

You keep using the phrase "severe anaphylatic reaction" but I haven't seen it used in any sources. Although to be fair, I can't read the WSJ article as I am not a subscriber

Everywhere I've seen has described an "adverse anapyhactoid reaction," which is a very wide category that covers a lot of ground from mild to serious. A "severe anaphylactic reaction" is a small subcategory of that larger category and much more life-threatening and serious.

 

Also from one of Ragu's links:
"
Dr. Gregory Poland, who runs the Vaccine Research Group at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, said he thinks the British regulators over-reacted.

People who have had anaphylactic shock reactions to previous vaccines should avoid this one, he said, but those with reactions to something other than a vaccine should still be allowed to receive the COVID-19 shot for now, said Poland, who studies the immunogenetics of vaccine response in adults and children."

 

Did it say they were injected with epineephrine, or simply that they carried those with them as an illustration of how severe their allergy problems are?

 

I used to think you were an intelligent asshole. Then the steel bullshit and this, from your link,...

This is a 7.8 percentage point, or 894,864 household decrease from the share who paid rent through December 6, 2019 and compares to 80.4 percent that had paid by November 6, 2020. It should be noted that December 5th and 6th fell on a weekend in 2020 and therefore may not be a direct comparison to last year’s figures. These data encompass a wide variety of market-rate rental properties across the United States, which can vary by size, type and average rental price.

"While the initial rent collection figures for the first week of December are concerning, only a full month's results will paint a complete picture. However, it should not come as a surprise that a rising number of households are struggling to make ends meet. As the nation enters a winter with increasing COVID-19 case levels and even greater economic distress – as indicated by last week’s disquieting employment report - it is only a matter of time before both renters and housing providers reach the end of their resources,” said Doug Bibby, NMHC President.

Now they did mention the way the weekend fell at an odd time, but 7.8%? Yes, the people who are running this are looking at past years. I actually read what you posted.

 

Two out of how many? A thousand? Ten thousand? A hundred?

 

So what's the beef? Scroll on down and look at the "Full Month Results" ... that's what I was looking at.